IMPORTANT NOTE: You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
At last; a jury accepts that media publicity provokes false allegations 11 Years, 5 Months ago
I wish they had been the jurors in my case. Roache's liars were 6 (mine were 5) in number and female (mine were male). He was allowed more character witnesses than I was. One liar had her false claims thrown out during his trial - several of mine were thrown out in a second trial.
Re:At last; a jury accepts that media publicity provokes false allegations 11 Years, 5 Months ago
JK2006 wrote: I wish they had been the jurors in my case. Roache's liars were 6 (mine were 5) in number and female (mine were male). He was allowed more character witnesses than I was. One liar had her false claims thrown out during his trial - several of mine were thrown out in a second trial.
Re:At last; a jury accepts that media publicity provokes false allegations 11 Years, 5 Months ago
A waste of taxpayers and Roache's money and I expect he won't even bother trying to sue for his considerable costs as the accusers will, no doubt, cry bankruptcy and slope off into undeserved anonimity.
Re:At last; a jury accepts that media publicity provokes false allegations 11 Years, 5 Months ago
What is the Law now? - can the accusers be named?
You presumably know who your accusers were JK - have you been able to follow their careers since your trial? - I know one starred in a documentary for money, but anyone else able to cash in or exploit their status as a 'believed accuser'
Re:At last; a jury accepts that media publicity provokes false allegations 11 Years, 5 Months ago
Gnomo wrote: What is the Law now? - can the accusers be named?
You presumably know who your accusers were JK - have you been able to follow their careers since your trial? - I know one starred in a documentary for money, but anyone else able to cash in or exploit their status as a 'believed accuser'
Re:At last; a jury accepts that media publicity provokes false allegations 11 Years, 5 Months ago
Gnomo wrote: What is the Law now? - can the accusers be named?
You presumably know who your accusers were JK - have you been able to follow their careers since your trial? - I know one starred in a documentary for money, but anyone else able to cash in or exploit their status as a 'believed accuser'
They can be named if they are prosecuted and found guilty of making malicious complaints I think, not sure otherwise though...