www.express.co.uk/news/uk/468772/Maria-M...et-with-police-probe

Vile party and moan about the unemployed being a drain on the system, Tories know total bollocks.

Would you sack her ITK ?

andrew wrote:
Would you sack her ITK ?

Yes - for arrogance alone

Sounds like all Tories then ITK.

andrew wrote:
Sounds like all Tories then ITK.

... but at least the Tories have something to be arrogant about !

IMF predicts UK will out-perform ALL other G7 countries

www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-26935148

Could be better if Zero contract were scrapped, Amazon, Starbucks, Costa paid their taxes.

andrew wrote:
Could be better if Zero contract were scrapped, Amazon, Starbucks, Costa paid their taxes.


I wouldn't pay tax either if it was legal not to.

In The Know wrote:
andrew wrote:
Would you sack her ITK ?

Yes - for arrogance alone

To be fair that covers about 99% of those in parliament.

Yes and I've always wondered - what's wrong with arrogance? It's legal, isn't it? Mo Farrah has every right to be arrogant about his running skills - though he may be tempting fate.

If Miller's apology had been 34 seconds instead of 32 and had contained a sob and a tear, would it have been acceptable? And should we, as a society spend less time worrying about how many seconds proves sincerity? Perhaps we should devote more energy to locking up elderly comics for putting hands on knees 50 years ago.

JK2006 wrote:
If Miller's apology had been 34 seconds instead of 32 and had contained a sob and a tear, would it have been acceptable?

... the inquiry found NO FAULT with Miller, buy suggested she apologise for having made a mistake.

What mistake ? She knew what she was doing, Tories looking out for each other again, IDS should be sacked next for his mess at the DWP, or put him in a bed sit and pay hum £53 pw.