Guilty of one indecent assault.
Questions need to be asked about CPS and police behaviour.
People change memories over time. I'm sure every single claimant believed their claims. But without proof or evidence we must assume that, if anything did happen, the circumstances and emotions have been altered significantly by time and memory.
This is why "you should NOT be believed".
It's not just the crime of false allegations that the CPS and police should not be encouraging, but genuine delusions, exaggerations and inaccuracies which, if believed, can cause great distress, misery and possible death - often far worse abuses than the alleged original claims.

And it's time we, the bosses of the CPS and the police, told them to STOP encouraging this behaviour, whether intentional or not.

I hope the indecent assault was smack on the rear, sooner he is back on 5 Live the better.

JK2006 wrote:
Guilty of one indecent assault.


.... throw enough mud against a wall .....

It is all because in England now you are guilty until proven innocent. It looks like the jury see though the rape claims, I guess it happened but was consensual.

I think your all forgetting something.

He ADMITTED a string of child sex offences. The youngest kid aged 9.

He is a genuine paedophile is he not?

Rigsby; do please watch Vile Pervert: The Sequel, or at least listen to my song Plead Guilty, in which I sing "do NOT, under any circumstances, fall for the legal persuasion to plead guilty to crimes you have not committed in order to get lower sentences".

Then examine the tiny, short sentences initially given to Hall by the Judge. For a 9 year old? Extraordinary - unless it was only a tiny allegation.

Examining court transcripts it turns out he put a hand on her leg whilst reading her and her brother a bedtime story.

Then condemn if you feel you should.

JK2006 wrote:
Rigsby; do please watch Vile Pervert: The Sequel, or at least listen to my song Plead Guilty, in which I sing "do NOT, under any circumstances, fall for the legal persuasion to plead guilty to crimes you have not committed in order to get lower sentences".

Then examine the tiny, short sentences initially given to Hall by the Judge. For a 9 year old? Extraordinary - unless it was only a tiny allegation.

Examining court transcripts it turns out he put a hand on her leg whilst reading her and her brother a bedtime story.

Then condemn if you feel you should.

I thought it was "digital penetration"? Am I muxed ip?

It seems peculiar that first he was guilty of almost everything and this time of almost nothing,but we simply cant tell in trials that dont need evidence and where defendants are encouraged to plead guilty,but if he says he did it, is perfectly reasonable to believe him.