That Leonard Rossiter sex abuse story has reared its ugly head again
www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/leonard-ro...-bbc-workers-3742740

The BBC was "a cesspit of depravity" says the 66 year old. Well, if it was I never saw any of it. Some people!

And Leonard Rossiter was watching and performing a 'sex act' - which I assume means having a good wank - was wanking illegal in 1968? - heavens, I need to go into hiding!
Out of interest, since Hampstead Heath is owned and managed by the City of London Corporation (lot's of potential old pervs there) can the Corporation also be liable for allowing naughty things to happen on their property? Very lucrative pickings to be had from them!

Mail has revived that story as they do with many...their 'spot the leopard' pic has featured 2 times now

Seems like the 18 year old liked it.

Quite soon it will become a major story that a dead celebrity is NOT being investigated for once picking his nose.

JK2006 wrote:
Quite soon it will become a major story that a dead celebrity is NOT being investigated for once picking his nose.

Hopefully it won't, nothing stopped him telling the police decades earlier, what's the crime having a wank indoors ? The accuser most likely walked in his dressing room at the wrong moment.

Remember Rising Damp was made by ITV, Jimmy Edwards was openly gay will anyone accuse him, also nearly all of his TV shows has been wiped.

andrew wrote:
JK2006 wrote:
Quite soon it will become a major story that a dead celebrity is NOT being investigated for once picking his nose.

Hopefully it won't, nothing stopped him telling the police decades earlier, what's the crime having a wank indoors ? The accuser most likely walked in his dressing room at the wrong moment.


No, the point of it is that he (allegedly, and most probably a load of tripe) took part in a rape, not a "quiet moment".

The thing that stops people reporting rape to the police is comments like "he probably enjoyed it" and it is perfectly understandable.

honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote:
andrew wrote:
JK2006 wrote:
Quite soon it will become a major story that a dead celebrity is NOT being investigated for once picking his nose.

Hopefully it won't, nothing stopped him telling the police decades earlier, what's the crime having a wank indoors ? The accuser most likely walked in his dressing room at the wrong moment.


No, the point of it is that he (allegedly, and most probably a load of tripe) took part in a rape, not a "quiet moment".

The thing that stops people reporting rape to the police is comments like "he probably enjoyed it" and it is perfectly understandable.

Remember being queer was illegal, maybe he just bi-curious Yewtree is just total bollocks.

I'm only surprised old Len was in a good enough mood for such activities. He was so irascible and argumentative he was once offered a role in a BBC series, only for the BBC executive, after enduring his non-stop moaning as they travelled up together in the lift, to withdraw the offer by the time they reached the fourth floor.

The accusation(s) here are remarkably similar to the plot of the play in question...,

andrew wrote:
honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote:
andrew wrote:
JK2006 wrote:
Quite soon it will become a major story that a dead celebrity is NOT being investigated for once picking his nose.

Hopefully it won't, nothing stopped him telling the police decades earlier, what's the crime having a wank indoors ? The accuser most likely walked in his dressing room at the wrong moment.


No, the point of it is that he (allegedly, and most probably a load of tripe) took part in a rape, not a "quiet moment".

The thing that stops people reporting rape to the police is comments like "he probably enjoyed it" and it is perfectly understandable.

Remember being queer was illegal, maybe he just bi-curious Yewtree is just total bollocks.



Yes. Well, Yewtree would be reasonable IF there was any evidence of sex rings and orgies, and IF there was evidence of an offence and IF the accused was able to defend themselves, otherwise we have to accept that even if a crime was committed sometimes it is just too late to prosecute and we have to live with it.

There is still no evidence of Savile.