IMPORTANT NOTE: You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
Re:Lovely long lunch with Jane Moore 10 Years, 9 Months ago
JK2006 wrote: Well it had to start late as she's on Loose Women at the moment. We've been friends for well over 30 years. A great mate and loyal supporter.
...and a lovely husband!
Re:Lovely long lunch with Jane Moore 10 Years, 9 Months ago
JK2006 wrote: Well it had to start late as she's on Loose Women at the moment. We've been friends for well over 30 years. A great mate and loyal supporter.
The only columnist who is actually worth reading, she is in touch with reality.
Re:Lovely long lunch with Jane Moore 10 Years, 9 Months ago
Yes, Dixie, Jane and I were reminiscing about the period when Gary was falling in love with her; I was getting updates confidentially on an hourly basis! It was terribly sweet. And now here we are with me giving her tips on books for their 10 year old to read (Philip Pullman).
Re:Lovely long lunch with Jane Moore 10 Years, 9 Months ago
honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote: I am quite a fan of Jane Moore, but if her and Janet Street-Porter keep being sensible on loose women the show is in danger of being taken seriously.
If blokes said the same thing on TV there be complaints all over, women say what they like no fucker cares.
You can tell all these women are through their menopause.
Re:Lovely long lunch with Jane Moore 10 Years, 8 Months ago
andrew wrote: honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote: I am quite a fan of Jane Moore, but if her and Janet Street-Porter keep being sensible on loose women the show is in danger of being taken seriously.
If blokes said the same thing on TV there be complaints all over, women say what they like no fucker cares.
You can tell all these women are through their menopause.
Re:Lovely long lunch with Jane Moore 10 Years, 8 Months ago
honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote: JK2006 wrote: Not convinced by Janet but 100% agree about Jane and told her so.
I am not normally keen on JSP, but recently she seems to have dropped the bad tempered shoutiness. I think someone must have had a word
It probably took all of this time for them to get one in.
A shame Moore writes for such a morally corrupt and wretched newspaper, it undermines her own position, but she certainly seems to want to do the right thing. Moving to another paper would be one such right thing.
Re:Lovely long lunch with Jane Moore 10 Years, 8 Months ago
JK2006 wrote: I'm not sure a newspaper has "morals". It can be good or bad, sell millions or hundreds, and usually has bits of everything in it, good and bad.
And it can lie and refuse to apologise for lying. I hope all of those hacks meet people from Merseyside, who'll tell them what they think of the disgusting publication for which they take a wage.
Re:Lovely long lunch with Jane Moore 10 Years, 8 Months ago
Pru wrote: JK2006 wrote: I'm not sure a newspaper has "morals". It can be good or bad, sell millions or hundreds, and usually has bits of everything in it, good and bad.
And it can lie and refuse to apologise for lying. I hope all of those hacks meet people from Merseyside, who'll tell them what they think of the disgusting publication for which they take a wage.
I wish she would move newspapers so I could read her column, (sometimes people cut and paste it for me)
Re:Lovely long lunch with Jane Moore 10 Years, 8 Months ago
When the lovely Lynda Lee-Potter died (she used to write me in prison - long letters hand written on numerous postcards), I urged Dacre to sign Jane Moore to the Mail but it never happened.
Re:Lovely long lunch with Jane Moore 10 Years, 8 Months ago
JK2006 wrote: When the lovely Lynda Lee-Potter died (she used to write me in prison - long letters hand written on numerous postcards), I urged Dacre to sign Jane Moore to the Mail but it never happened.
If I was the editor of the sun I would pay her whatever it took to keep her!