Now they hide newspapers!!!!

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2845452...tures-headlines.html

It reminds me of when one of my boys who was learning to read piped up in the supermarket queue " "Gosh, isnt it shocking that John Major sexually attacked President Clinton?"
He handed me a newspaper with the headline "Major raps Clinton"

I think children DO need protecting from sexual content etc, but there are a hundred uncovered magazines that are far worse. They should cover them all up or not bother at all.

Not mine, but a comment in the DM says it all

So what happens when the newspaper gets into the home? Do we hide them under the sofa?

Perhaps the next step will be for all the newspapers to have identical front pages, which say nothing other than "Trigger warning - may contain news".

Women weekly magazine need to be covered up, who wants to read my about incest as it's always on the front covers ?

The US-UK past 35 years fraudulent exploitation or prohibition of natural curiosity, is now producing banal paranoia.

With 14 million UK under-16s now supposedly to be 'Protected' from their own family paper, selling 10 million copies daily to 22 million readers, including 14 million under-16s.

US-UK fraudulent prohibition of under-16s natural curiosity explored daily in bathrooms, bike-sheds, and bedrooms, is now itself 'Serious Child Abuse By OVER Protection'. The sick 'Over Protectors' should be severely prosecuted, psychologically treated for banal paranoia, and placed on a Child Protection Register, for life!

Proven by the past, 'prohibition-protection' succeeds only in creating more-not-less interest.