The Emperor has no clothes!

www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-surrey-30325019

It has been drawn to MWT's attention: twitter.com/mwilliamsthomas/status/540264688463126528

Oh I'm sure MWT has been aware of it for some time, Jo.

He really is giving the impression of enjoying the misery and death of children.
If this case is "not suspicious" why the hell does he feel the need to announce it?

Mark Williams-Thomas ‏@mwilliamsthomas 3h3 hours ago
Police investigation death of 13-month-old girl at a nursery in Scotland say at this stage it is not being treated as suspicious

JK2006 wrote:
The Emperor has no clothes!

www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-surrey-30325019

Quoting from above.

'No charges will be brought against former staff at a school in Surrey where Jimmy Savile abused girls.'

'He was one of Britain's most prolific sex abusers and is thought to have assaulted hundreds of people between the ages of five and 75.

He had denied the allegations of child abuse at Duncroft when questioned by police in 2009.

The matter was referred to the CPS which advised there was insufficient evidence to take further action.'

And all without a single conviction!...Good job the dead cannot sue.

"Where Savile abused girls" says the BBC announcer; no, that is the point, where he DID NOT abuse girls. That's why there is no evidence that he did. Bring on the prosecutions for perverting the course of justice.

From what I can make out, the police also interviewed or contacted about 100 former pupils, not bad for an institution where only 25 or so were present at a time, and didn't find much convincing evidence there. The Met even tried to stop "Susan", who was the girl Savile was visiting at Duncroft from giving evidence to the Dame Janet Smith inquiry.

annaraccoon.com/2014/04/29/exclusive-the...vilisation-part-one/
annaraccoon.com/2014/11/30/duncroft-the-finale-part-one/

I would like to read what the 100 residents said and as taxpayers are forking out millions we should be entitled to.

The BBC just mimics Murdoch News now that article simply lies. "5-70" ? what utter claptrap..there has never ever been an instance of an offender having such wide ranging aged victims and there is no proof that Savile did.

The report on hospitals says Savile made "inappropriate remarks" which they conclude is abuse..more Stalinist re-writing that ignores the Carry On era of humour perpetuated by, err the BBC and all News Ltd titles.

Why bring out the truth, truth is a non story in the Savile case, a man convicted by media, every story is true apart from the truth.
MWT's gate will in the next few years have many people outside waiting for him, pick on the dead as they cannot answer back but you also brought down the alive too and sure as trees are trees MWT will ne outed as a cheat, a self promoter, magician of evidence, its all smoke, mirrors and deception for financial gain.

And now, after the Ray Teret verdict that Savile did NOT abuse the girl claiming that he did, we find both police AND jurors consider him innocent but the media approach is "why kill a great story?".