IMPORTANT NOTE: You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
|
Home Forums |
Oooh ... now its Prince Andrew !!!!!!
TOPIC: Oooh ... now its Prince Andrew !!!!!!
|
In The Know (but not this time)
|
Oooh ... now its Prince Andrew !!!!!! 10 Years, 6 Months ago
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Re:Oooh ... now its Prince Andrew !!!!!! 10 Years, 6 Months ago
|
|
" forced by Epstein to have sex with the prince when she was a minor"
How does a third party force you to have sex with someone else? Surely you would just say to your punter "I am being coerced, please call the police" ? Or just "Eff off" ?
I don't like the way these stories portray young women as helpless morons without a will of their own and completely controlled by men.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Re:Oooh ... now its Prince Andrew !!!!!! 10 Years, 6 Months ago
|
|
Andy wrote:
honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote:
" forced by Epstein to have sex with the prince when she was a minor"
How does a third party force you to have sex with someone else? Surely you would just say to your punter "I am being coerced, please call the police" ? Or just "Eff off" ?
I don't like the way these stories portray young women as helpless morons without a will of their own and completely controlled by men.
I don't buy the coercion story. I reckon that after earning thousands jetting around the world as highly paid prostitutes, these women have found that since they are no longer paid as much to provide their services (having reached an age where they are no longer as much in demand), that by portraying themselves as having been victims, they can make a fortune from claiming compensation, or selling the story to the media.
Now the photos emerge .....
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2895719...-sexual-contact.html
She is described as a "masseuse" .... why was he being intriduced to a masseuse?
Perhaps she was giving him business advice !!!!!!!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
In The Know (but not this time)
|
Re:Oooh ... now its Prince Andrew !!!!!! 10 Years, 6 Months ago
|
|
I thought he had been sacked from his trade "job" - whats he doing in Davos ?
I notice the continued denials (but he's NOT going to be appearing in Court though !)
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Re:Oooh ... now its Prince Andrew !!!!!! 10 Years, 6 Months ago
|
|
In The Know wrote:
One of the Edwards - can't remember his number, but the fat one who took over from Victoria - once appeared in a divorce case didn't he? (named by the "other woman")
hedda will remember - he probably covered it !
Its was Lady Mordaunt, hedda - just remembered .... they had her sent to the nut house !
==
A conspiracy?
The convenient finding of insanity inevitably gave rise to suspicions that there was a conspiracy to silence Lady Mordaunt. Reynold’s News, for example, asked why the Prince ("a young married man") should have been "so eager to pay weekly visits to a young married woman when her husband was absent, if it was all so innocent?"
There is some evidence that the Establishment closed ranks at a time when republican sympathies in Britain and Ireland had been aroused by Queen Victoria’s virtual withdrawal from public life. It seems that, in advance of the trial, the Prince's Household received private assurances that his position would be protected as far as possible, and, some years later, his private secretary, Francis Knollys, recalled that the Prime Minister William Gladstone had been involved indirectly "and successfully" behind the scenes.
The Queen strongly disapproved of her son's (and daughter-in-law's) lifestyle, writing to her eldest daughter, the Crown Princess of Prussia, on 2 March 1870 that "they lead far too frivolous a life and are far too intimate with people - with a small set of not the best and wisest people who consider being fast the right thing". She seemed especially concerned (with, as Roy Hattersley has put it, "admirable understanding of the moral superiority of the lower orders of society") that the affair could damage the Prince's reputation in the eyes of "the middle and lower classes". However, Victoria seems to have been convinced of her son's innocence regarding Lady Mordaunt and remained staunch in his defence, as did Alexandra, who described him to her sister-in-law Princess Louise as "my naughty little man", but was nonetheless deeply hurt by the affair. For his part, Gladstone observed rather despairingly to his Colonial Secretary, Lord Granville, that "in rude and general terms, the Queen is invisible and the Prince of Wales is not respected".
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harriet_Mordaunt#A_conspiracy.3F
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|