cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Go to bottomPost New TopicPost Reply
TOPIC: No Tits ?
#126677
In The Know

No Tits ? 10 Years, 6 Months ago  
... in the Sun ?

Have they moved with the times or is it just a cynical ploy to drive people to the (paid for) website that will STILL carry the images?

I'll let you decide !
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#126679
Re:No Tits ? 10 Years, 6 Months ago  
I have to say, once again, The Sun was an absolute joy to work for; professional, efficient, deserving all of the 5 million plus circulation it had during my ten years as a weekly columnist.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#126693
andrew

Re:No Tits ? 10 Years, 6 Months ago  
JK2006 wrote:
I have to say, once again, The Sun was an absolute joy to work for; professional, efficient, deserving all of the 5 million plus circulation it had during my ten years as a weekly columnist.

No one reports football better than The Sun.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#126703
Kenneth Mintcake

Re:No Tits ? 10 Years, 6 Months ago  
andrew wrote:
JK2006 wrote:
I have to say, once again, The Sun was an absolute joy to work for; professional, efficient, deserving all of the 5 million plus circulation it had during my ten years as a weekly columnist.

No one reports football better than The Sun.


Not in 1989 it didn't.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#126711
andrew

Re:No Tits ? 10 Years, 6 Months ago  
Kenneth Mintcake wrote:
andrew wrote:
JK2006 wrote:
I have to say, once again, The Sun was an absolute joy to work for; professional, efficient, deserving all of the 5 million plus circulation it had during my ten years as a weekly columnist.

No one reports football better than The Sun.


Not in 1989 it didn't.


I was 3 years old then.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#126722
Re:No Tits ? 10 Years, 6 Months ago  
Kenneth Mintcake wrote:
andrew wrote:
JK2006 wrote:
I have to say, once again, The Sun was an absolute joy to work for; professional, efficient, deserving all of the 5 million plus circulation it had during my ten years as a weekly columnist.

No one reports football better than The Sun.


Not in 1989 it didn't.


Exactly. Many of us have never read it since.

I did recently drop my principals a bit when they were doing coupons for five pounds worth of free meat or vegetables at Morrisons. I wouldn't buy a copy but asked my husband to bring home the discarded ones from his work canteen. I was truly mortified when he left one on the back shelf of the car for all to see!
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#126724
Re:No Tits ? 10 Years, 6 Months ago  
I really admired the Scouse boycott but still consider the police to be the villains there - they started and promoted the vile excuse for their appalling behaviour.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#126729
andrew

Re:No Tits ? 10 Years, 6 Months ago  
JK2006 wrote:
I really admired the Scouse boycott but still consider the police to be the villains there - they started and promoted the vile excuse for their appalling behaviour.

It was the police who sold the lies remember they altered the statements.

It was a tragic accident and hope the victims families find the justice they deserve.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#126730
hedda

Re:No Tits ? 10 Years, 6 Months ago  
JK2006 wrote:
I have to say, once again, The Sun was an absolute joy to work for; professional, efficient, deserving all of the 5 million plus circulation it had during my ten years as a weekly columnist.

JK I have worked for many media outlets and the only one that paid on time and gave me no grief was News Corp.

## mind you I am easily bought
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#126731
In The Know

Re:No Tits ? 10 Years, 6 Months ago  
andrew wrote:

It was a tragic accident


still in denial ?

someone trampled them to death, didn't they?
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#126732
Re:No Tits ? 10 Years, 6 Months ago  
Yes I've never known any other media organisation more efficient - whatever one may think morally.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#126733
Re:No Tits ? 10 Years, 6 Months ago  
No I think it WAS a tragic accident (caused by various reasons) but the cover up afterwards was essentially police protecting their own and that was truly disgraceful but no surprise.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#126734
easily had hedda

Re:No Tits ? 10 Years, 6 Months ago  
I lie of course...

the other person who never ever quibbled about payment was Kerry Packer.

The nightmare of all nightmares- Robert Maxwell and for a few years I worked on a publciation owned by Adnan Kashoggi- a joy to work for. (Arabs always are. )

This is of course the way to (1) buy loyalty and (2) ensure you get maximum performance from who you are paying.

I know people in their late 70s who are still on generous pensions from Big Kerry long after they retired.

sadly his son does not have the same philosophy nor do I think does Rupert's ( except Lachlan who will never be in charge because he is far too nice)

### Tits are still there..just covered
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#126738
andrew

Re:No Tits ? 10 Years, 6 Months ago  
JK2006 wrote:
No I think it WAS a tragic accident (caused by various reasons) but the cover up afterwards was essentially police protecting their own and that was truly disgraceful but no surprise.

Quite right JK.

Also any justice for Heysel ITK ?
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#126739
Re:No Tits ? 10 Years, 6 Months ago  
JK2006 wrote:
No I think it WAS a tragic accident (caused by various reasons) but the cover up afterwards was essentially police protecting their own and that was truly disgraceful but no surprise.

It is not an accident if someone sees people being crushed and then does nothing.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#126741
In The Know

Re:No Tits ? 10 Years, 6 Months ago  
JK2006 wrote:
No I think it WAS a tragic accident (caused by various reasons) but the cover up afterwards was essentially police protecting their own and that was truly disgraceful but no surprise.

I agree with the police / cover-up (all after the event) BUT when you say it was a "tragic accident" are you saying these people did not realise they were pushing / shoving and trampling people to death ?
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#126742
Re:No Tits ? 10 Years, 6 Months ago  
Yes unfortunately; I've been in an out-of-control mob a couple of times in my life and you're swept along like a tidal wave.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#126743
In The Know

Re:No Tits ? 10 Years, 6 Months ago  
andrew wrote:
Also any justice for Heysel ITK ?

Still deluded !

===

Approximately 1 hour before the Juventus-Liverpool final was due to kick off, a large group of Liverpool fans breached a fence separating them from a "neutral area" which contained mostly Juventus fans. They ran back on the terraces and away from the threat into a concrete retaining wall. Fans already seated near the wall were crushed; eventually the wall collapsed. Many people climbed over to safety, but many others died or were badly injured. The game was played despite the disaster in order to prevent further violence.

The tragedy resulted in all English football clubs being placed under an indefinite ban by UEFA from all European competitions (lifted in 1990-91), with Liverpool being excluded for an additional 3 years, later reduced to 1, and fourteen Liverpool fans found guilty of manslaughter and each sentenced to three years' imprisonment. The disaster was later described as "the darkest hour in the history of the UEFA competitions"

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heysel_Stadium_disaster

Rampaging Liverpool fans AGAIN !
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#126744
In The Know

Re:No Tits ? 10 Years, 6 Months ago  
JK2006 wrote:
Yes unfortunately; I've been in an out-of-control mob a couple of times in my life and you're swept along like a tidal wave.

You can't abdicate ALL responsibility because it was someone else doing the pushing !

It WASN'T an "accident" that they were pushing - it was a deliberate (selfish, callous) act (and YOU used the words "out of control").
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#126749
andrew

Re:No Tits ? 10 Years, 6 Months ago  
In The Know wrote:
JK2006 wrote:
Yes unfortunately; I've been in an out-of-control mob a couple of times in my life and you're swept along like a tidal wave.

You can't abdicate ALL responsibility because it was someone else doing the pushing !

It WASN'T an "accident" that they were pushing - it was a deliberate (selfish, callous) act (and YOU used the words "out of control").


I dare you shout this statment on top of Anfield.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
Go to topPost New TopicPost Reply