cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Go to bottomPost New TopicPost Reply
TOPIC: Carl Beech Guilty
#191167
Carl Beech Guilty 6 Years, 1 Month ago  
and bent cops and CPS will claim he's the exception that proves the rule whereas he's just the most extreme example of the thousands of false accusers who get away with it; exaggerate less and are helped by bent cops and lawyers; don't involve celebrities or make sure they are dead.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#191174
Re:Carl Beech Guilty 6 Years, 1 Month ago  
Carl Beech is just one peculiar man though. The real criminals, in my view, are the ones who aided and abetted him.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#191177
Sheba Bear

Re:Carl Beech Guilty 6 Years, 1 Month ago  
Big fail from the Mail:

Beech ruthlessly exploited the hysteria of the post-Savile era when the country was gripped by collective guilt over the institutional failings that allowed the now notorious DJ to abuse at will.

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7274151...-lies-son-VICAR.html

Savile was never convicted of any sexual crimes,as we all know,and is innocent in the eyes of the law. Yet the Mail sees fit to perpetuate the myth for which there was no evidence other than people (in line for compo) saying that it had happened.

My guess is that as an unmarried man he took advantage of girls who threw themselves at him. As any man would. At least back then.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#191178
Stormzy Daniels

Re:Carl Beech Guilty 6 Years, 1 Month ago  
This clown is just one of many who claim such stuff.Youtube is filled with folk who are "survivors of satanic ritual abuse"
I find folk who lie about being sexually abused the absolute worst.
Being molested as a child is bad enough...so why folk feel the need to exagerate it or just make it up from scratch for attention disgusts me.
Ive not looked but I expect there are a ton of Youtubers who have been "injected with cancer" by freemasons and illuminati at some satanic celebrity gathering aswell..complete with shaven head pics as "total proof it happened"
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#191193
Randall

Re:Carl Beech Guilty 6 Years, 1 Month ago  
Sheba Bear wrote:
Yet the Mail sees fit to perpetuate the myth for which there was no evidence other than people (in line for compo) saying that it had happened.

The Mail also misses the howlingly obvious logical next step... Which is that almost all current prosecutions of living men who actually get imprisoned for years are on the same basis.


Stormzy Daniels wrote:

I expect there are a ton of Youtubers who have been "injected with cancer" by freemasons and illuminati at some satanic celebrity gathering aswell
Don't forget people abducted by aliens (and often sexually abused by them too, possibly satanically). The majority of the activity of the British criminal justice apparatus is now conducted at this standard.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#191195
Jo

Re:Carl Beech Guilty 6 Years, 1 Month ago  
Stormzy Daniels wrote:
This clown is just one of many who claim such stuff.Youtube is filled with folk who are "survivors of satanic ritual abuse"
I find folk who lie about being sexually abused the absolute worst.
Being molested as a child is bad enough...so why folk feel the need to exagerate it or just make it up from scratch for attention disgusts me.
Ive not looked but I expect there are a ton of Youtubers who have been "injected with cancer" by freemasons and illuminati at some satanic celebrity gathering aswell..complete with shaven head pics as "total proof it happened"


Moor Larkin said it well (in a comment under a blogpost):

"It's fairly clear that the "Activists" are mostly petty criminals and ex-alcoholics or hop-heads. The head honchoes that are visible all have well-dodgy CV's and appear to vary their stories as they go along. They also never have real contemporaries to add balance or credence to their versions of events. You have to believe them - end of discussion. If you don't they fly into wild temper tantrums.

They flew into a rage when David Rose got the Mail to re-expose Steven Messham, although why Messham needed to be exposed yet again is baffling. Rose referred to it as Institutional Amnesia I think. I would see it more as conniving sensationalist journalism, political agendas and pure commercial greed by a pack of lying liars and sex fantasists. I'm sure a lot of them get their jollies describing all this sex stuff."


jimcannotfixthis.blogspot.com/2015/01/wh...be.html?view=classic

Those last sentences must surely have applied to Carl Beech, as his earlier convictions suggest, and probably to a lot of others who make false claims and/or set themselves up as "paedo hunters". Perhaps even some enablers fall into the same category.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
Go to topPost New TopicPost Reply