Virginia Roberts. See her interview after court, body language the eye falling to the floor points to someone not telling truths.

The second woman had to read her accusations. To me if things happen you do not need to read it out from a clip board.

These ladies were on the game..that's their business and perhaps they have a case of being taken advantage of.

The "trafficking" charge sounded far worse that it is of course. It's a catch all law that means taking someone who may be under the legal age in one state to another..by luxury jet ..is against the law. Much of the public conjure up images of teens snatched off the street.

I believe the Prince Andrew claim is bogus because I do not think he is that stupid nor are any of the Royal men.

# Note they are now claiming Lord Mountbatten was "too fond of boys"..although that's now become "too fond of men". Oh really?. Not a single one has come forward have they?

It was against the law at the time of course but if the "boy/man" had been coerced they would have featured on the front page of The News of The World years ago long after the law was changed...even anonymously.

In reality I Propose that Mountbatten may have had the occasional assignation with a friendly gay Guardsman...keeping it "in the family " so to speak (just as a well known barrister I knew lived in hope of having)

While Andrew may have been unwise getting snapped at Epsteins' (even Epstein has the right to have a normal life after jail) I don't for a single minute think he would be foolish enough to have opportunistic sex with a teen girl who was working for Epstein.

In fact- while I have no idea of what actually went on I believe the Andrew claim (and the Alan Dershowitz one) will be a huge mistake for the claimant and help demolish her case. Don't known about the others of course.

## I doubt this will be the slam dunk these ladies and their lawyer thinks it will be now that Epstein is dead. With his brother as executor and in control of over $500M I reckon he will string it out for years. Eventually the accusers may accept settlements at which time they will find their lawyer will take the bulk.

Perhaps she's a bandwaggoner trying to maximise a compensation payout by spreading her allegations far and wide.

I thought she was the first woman to make allegations about Epstein, but there was apparently an earlier one called Maria Farmer -- assuming that what she claims about reporting Epstein to the FBI in 1996 is correct:
www.motherjones.com/crime-justice/2019/0...-very-very-sick-pal/
www.nytimes.com/2019/08/26/us/epstein-fa...sisters-maxwell.html
Her affidavit of April this year: www.scribd.com/document/406613394/Affidavit-of-Maria-Farmer

It seems a bit odd that if she had reported her own assault to the FBI at the time, they did nothing about it. Also odd that her affidavit makes no mention of any report being made about the alleged assault of her 15-year-old sister.

Judging by the response from Eileen Guggenheim at the end of this article (news.artnet.com/art-world/maria-farmer-n...-art-academy-1610506), Farmer may be given to making things up too, though Guggenheim does say Farmer told her in 1996 that something "untoward" had happened with Epstein and Maxwell.

The one who made the Andrew claimant is on record of having authored a book proposal where she discusses having to beef up her accusations - it formed part of a sealed court "evidence- which is what Alan Dershowitz says exonerates him.

I think Dershowitz will be the one who demolishes the Andrew Claims and he does have a pretty good case that her lawyers are being highly unethical if not illegal by perpetuating proven false claims.

This really is a game of who will cave in first- the claimants or Epstein's executors. We saw this with the Jimmy Savile claims where his executors, the bank who Savile must have thought he could trust- basically let lawyers and claimants gobble up his estate.

However with Epstein it's probably personal with his brother in control. Perhaps he will settle for an easy life or perhaps he will fight tooth and nail.

## the one who lives in Australia..has she considered how this will affect her children?. She's telling he world she was a prostitute.