Harry and Meghan are clearly being funded by anonymous individuals - or organisation(s).

A giveaway was the Vancouver Island mansion, which they seem to like - and live in, whenever convenient.


Paying off the taxpayer for Frogmore may be admirable.

But, although relinquishing some titles - they'll soon have a new one.


Do they know so many questions will need answers?

Or are the experiences of the last major royal to permanently live abroad (a King!) to be replicated.

As he (and his divorcee US wife) also attempted to do..

I have lost my log in details and it wont re-register me for some reason.

What new titles? They are still the wotsits of Sussex, just without the HRH. (still HRH on their website though)
Of course, they will soon be the only royals in the village, which might be nice for them.

What would be the purpose of somebody funding them? I thought royals and politicians were funded all the time by various people, such as Richard Branson loaning out his Island.
I haven't noticed him gain anything from it, nor Elton.

Like Diana, I doubt Harry & Meghan will be short of billionaires to pick up the tab. Or Princess Margaret- they had to get in a queue.

And his dad will be King of England within the next few years.
Charles must almost be a billionaire..and Harry's his heir !!!

I reckon this a clever move..all the perks and no fetes to open.

Don't forget he's suing media and lots more editors and journalists are rather worried. So they should.
If it turns out the top and tail of the rift is caused by the media, it will be curtains for many.

Whilst the usual groups like byline and hacked off are being praised in the blogosphere, I would like to thank the individuals (who know more than most) who are battling against the media bastards.

My presence on the web is gradually reducing as I distance myself from those who I suspected shouldn't be trusted in telling truth in the first place.

The glory will not be theirs.

Bookworm wrote:
My presence on the web is gradually reducing....

Although I hadn't really noticed it (your presence) - good luck anyway¡

I still think like Germaine Greer that Meghan is .."a bolter".

I hope they are deeply in love but..

I reckon Harry adores her and he comes across as such a nice person. This move may even mean he can give a whole lot more to his role. I simply don;t believe most of the gutter media.

## Recall I worked in an official capacity on Diana's final visit to Australia to launch the Victor Chang Institute.

What a hectic 3 days it was (few people know that her deep love for Dr. Hasnat Khan is why she decided to do this as her last "official"duty).

Apart form being smuggled out of the Ritz Carlton Hotel under a blanket with Diana and 2 others in a limo unnoticed by the media. (and where I spent an hour in the bar with Michael Hutchence the night before he hanged himself)) I will always remember the 11pm phone call asking me to attend the Sacred Heart Hospice in Sydney which Diana said she wanted to visit at 11pm when the media would not know.

This summed up Princess Diana for me: she stayed at the Hospice for 5 hours chatting to dying people..AID's and cancer patients etc.

At around 4am as her driver drove me home on his way to her hotel I asked her why she spent so much time with sick or dying people. She said words to the effect "if I can make them feel wonderful for a short time (which she did) I can't not do it"..

Th following day sitting at the next table at the Commonwealth Day lunch at Sydney's Darling Harbour ( as the only media allowed inside) I gazed over at the world's assembled media..100s of them including all those British correspondents and Paparazzi..glaring at me. noses pressed up against the giant glass wimdows )
# I made a wonderful Faux Pas by asking the i=other person lunching with me- Shane Warne- who he was. Pretty sure the assembled media hated me more for sitting with Shane than just a table away from Diana).

The others at our table were 2 mothers with a a young boy and a girl who had the AID's virus via blood injections. As the afternoon wore on these kids became almost unmanageable and began crying and screaming.
Within a minute Diana was up and over to out table cuddling these 2 kids and chatting to their Mums as the children quietened down and began to giggle with Diana.

## when I heard she was allegedly dating Dodi Fayed who I had lived with for 4 months in his Park Lane apartment in between flats..you could have knocked me over with a feather. !!

## Both Harry & Will have so much of Diana's humanity. Meghan will eventually leave Harry..it's destiny. He'll settle down with a lovely Sloane Ranger named Cressida or Felicity..and Archie will be one of the most famous lads o0n the planet.

### Piers Morgan is a cunt.

#### Extracts from Diary Of A Nobody in The 21St Century.. The Tragic Tale of A Complete Nonentity & His/Her's Brush With Fame

No matter how much Harry and Megsan renounce protection, they have to have it under certain laws which will involve a lot of monitoring. Why? because Archie will always be the property of HRH The Queen as long as he is a child. Not even H&M can change that.

The problems the press has caused will not be ignored. How many cases still in the courts? and ones we don't know of yet.

Luckily, from tomorrow, I am on a course for several weeks/months.