Enjoy!

On Youtube, the more "likes" a video has, the more it is promoted, so it might be better for us all to click the "watch it on youtube" button and press "like" .
The more people hear about this police farce the better.

I'm enjoying these diaries, however they are becoming more of a platform for highlighting so called false allegations, rather than been a diary of how you are coping with self-isolating and the coronavirus. Some of the allegations are of course false, like those against Alex Salmond and Paul Gambacini which has been through court or been dropped, however those against Jimmy Saville, we don't know if they are true or false as they have never been tested in a court of law. They are merely unproven allegations.
I would really like to see more on how to help people cope with self isolation, such as recommendations for tv shows, cooking tips, books to read, podcasts etc.

Thank you Robbie; I do intend to chat about a greater variety of topics; we have quite a lot of days to fill!

Robbie, if allegations are unproven, shouldn't we assume innocence? Otherwise we might just as well not bother with courts at all.

Honey wrote:
Robbie, if allegations are unproven, shouldn't we assume innocence? Otherwise we might just as well not bother with courts at all.

Yes absolutely we should assume innocence, but it doesn't mean that the accusers are making false allegations, only unproven allegations, or untested allegations.

Honey wrote:
Robbie, if allegations are unproven, shouldn't we assume innocence? Otherwise we might just as well not bother with courts at all.

In America the judge and jury go by who can tell the better lie or story. It's good though that some criminals in USA are getting employment as soon they are released.

Green Man wrote:
Honey wrote:
Robbie, if allegations are unproven, shouldn't we assume innocence? Otherwise we might just as well not bother with courts at all.

In America the judge and jury go by who can tell the better lie or story. It's good though that some criminals in USA are getting employment as soon they are released.

Are they? How does that work?

We seem to go out of our way to nobble ex prisoners instead of helping them. And then wonder why they come back.

Honey wrote:
Green Man wrote:
Honey wrote:
Robbie, if allegations are unproven, shouldn't we assume innocence? Otherwise we might just as well not bother with courts at all.

In America the judge and jury go by who can tell the better lie or story. It's good though that some criminals in USA are getting employment as soon they are released.

Are they? How does that work?

We seem to go out of our way to nobble ex prisoners instead of helping them. And then wonder why they come back.

Live out there and work in hospitality then you will know.

Every week or in the newspapers prisoners were getting released, then having convictions quashed due to shitty trials.

Lawyers are rats in suits.

Years ago I was attacked unprovoked. I fought back gave the bastard a bloody good hiding then was convicted for array. Just for defending myself and payroll.

Being brought up during The Troubles and during the Rodney King riots you soon have a backbone.