Peter Hitchens in the Mail. He's NOT saying it's a conspiracy (it isn't). He's not saying intentional corruption (it isn't). He's saying it's Panic.

www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-89016...en-didnt-notice.html

And... Sarah Vine in the Mail (Mrs Gove) says "the only alternative" to Lockdown is to "let the virus run wild". Why must everyone assume one extreme or the other? Like Sweden, a balanced approach to a trivial (for most) virus is sensible; hygiene, social distancing (intelligently), common sense; serious protection and treatment for the vulnerable. As a vulnerable, elderly, diabetic I have been, I think, sensible. I hope I don't catch it (again). If I do, I hope I'll be suitably treated and cured.

Agreed. Just wear a protective mask, wash your hands, stay the hell away from people and we can all just get on with it.

JK2006 wrote:
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8904617...FIVE-TIMES-high.html

It doesn't matter because nobody was even looking at their silly charts anyway.