They can sod off too.

And if they really want to be inclusive, how about making period pants in the style of underpants, because no "man" wants a stupid bow on the waistline, and they tend not to wear knickers.

www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-96728...n-instead-woman.html

Maybe the firm is just hoping to expand its customer base to include people who imagine they're menstruating. Or perhaps it's to accommodate all the female-to-male transitioners written about by Abigail Shrier who can now be considered "people" after identifying as male. Though from what she says, male hormones play havoc with the female reproductive system, so I'm not sure if they would still menstruate.

'Why is it that if a biological male identifies as a woman and wants to be referred to as a woman that is sacrosanct and cannot be questioned?' one argued.

'But if a biological female identifies as a woman and wants to be referred to as a woman that's transphobic and she needs to be silenced?'
This seems to sum it up. I'm aware of someone who has been blocked by Facebook for a month for the second time this year for what Facebook considers "hate" on the transgender issue. Her Twitter account has also disappeared, perhaps for the same reason. From what I've seen of what she writes she doesn't seem to be offensive or extreme to me, just to have been standing up for the rights of women.

Jo wrote:
Maybe the firm is just hoping to expand its customer base to include people who imagine they're menstruating. Or perhaps it's to accommodate all the female-to-male transitioners written about by Abigail Shrier who can now be considered "people" after identifying as male. Though from what she says, male hormones play havoc with the female reproductive system, so I'm not sure if they would still menstruate.

'Why is it that if a biological male identifies as a woman and wants to be referred to as a woman that is sacrosanct and cannot be questioned?' one argued.

'But if a biological female identifies as a woman and wants to be referred to as a woman that's transphobic and she needs to be silenced?'
This seems to sum it up. I'm aware of someone who has been blocked by Facebook for a month for the second time this year for what Facebook considers "hate" on the transgender issue. Her Twitter account has also disappeared, perhaps for the same reason. From what I've seen of what she writes she doesn't seem to be offensive or extreme to me, just to have been standing up for the rights of women.
She comes across as a deeply caring person with a huge heart. She has been treated very badly by the superficially obsessed media.