It's becoming very intriguing. Seems Langham's accuser has been in the habit of crying rape before. Kippers and stitching comes to mind.

It always makes me wonder in cases like this why it takes the 'victim' so long to come forward.
Afterall from what I gather she was 14-15 years old at the time of the alleged abuse and must have known at the time what was happening to her was wrong(If anything did happen of course).
So why did she keep visiting him on multiple occasions and why were the police not informed at the time.
I could understand it more if the girl had been alot younger but I would say in todays society most 14-15 year olds have a good understanding of sex and what its all about.
It seems to me she enjoyed the high life at the time and now fancies a few quid from the civil courts if Langham is proven guilty.

Looks like we have another professional victim then, Chrissy, but I'm intrigued as to where you found out about her previous accusations. I can't find this information anywhere.

One thing you'll notice will be the surprising lack of coverage when he puts his side of the story ("I didn't do it" is such a boring story).
I was amazed when I took the stand in my trial to notice that the media had deserted the Old Bailey en masse!

Anthony wrote:
Looks like we have another professional victim then, Chrissy, but I'm intrigued as to where you found out about her previous accusations. I can't find this information anywhere.

I read this piece from the BBC site Anthony.

news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/kent/6902832.stm

The information is on Ceefax 509 - about her having claimed to have been gang raped at school, and how her family refers to her as the "drama queen".