IMPORTANT NOTE: You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
Re:Bill Cosby conviction overturned 4 Years, 1 Month ago
Only one other accuser was allowed to testify at his first trial of June 2017. Jurors deliberated for 52 hours over 6 days without reaching a verdict. It was the longest deliberation in the history of Montgomery County.
The second trial came around six months after the launch of the MeToo movement. Five new accusers were allowed to testify. It took jurors only 14 hours over 2 days to reach the guilty verdict.
The focus of jury deliberations during the second trial seemed to have shifted from the issue of consent to drugs. This is reflected in the accounts of two young jurors (both aged 22) from each trial.
Bobby Duggan from the first trial stated: “if you quit just like that you could be getting away with something...you've got to be extra sure whether he is guilty or not guilty. You always want to be that extra sure.”
“We all said it a million times in the room," the 21-year-old said. "If there's other evidence, more substantial evidence, we would have had a better verdict than deadlocked."
When the juror of the second trial was asked why a guilty verdict had been reached, he replied: “I think it was [Cosby’s] deposition that he admitted to giving quallaudes to women in order to have sex with them.”
Re:Bill Cosby conviction overturned 4 Years, 1 Month ago
Very interesting, md.
The juror from the second trial says Cosby admitted to giving women Quaaludes but this article says "While Cosby admitted that he acquired seven prescriptions of Quaaludes with the intent to give the sedatives to young women he wanted to have sex with, he has not admitted to actually drugging any of his accusers."
He apparently also didnt say in the deposition whether he gave women Quaaludes without their knowledge, because his attorney objected to the question.
That article also says that while some women claim he used beverages to drug them, Constand and other women are claiming he gave them a pill, which they took.
Woman alone with man, man hands woman pill, woman takes pill, sexual activity ensues = sexual assault?
Woman takes pill, woman doesn't report sexual assault at the time but does so years later = reframing of a consensual encounter as sexual assault?
What these women seem to want people to believe is that they were as innocent as five-year-olds and took the pill because he was Dr Huxtable.
If SJS had lived as long as his older sister what kind of world would we live in now? I daydream about a Court case with him alive, then I get real and realise it would never have got to Court through lack of credible evidence.
It saddens me how many "BLAME" SJS for their own false accusations. Big sigh!
I think times are changing Amanda. As more and more people start seeing the False Allegations Industry for what it is, the likelihood of a major court case exposing the "enablers" rises.
I think the principal of justice is more important than an individual case, so even if I believed that Cosby had raped the women I would be pleased that a flaw in the system was spotted and corrected.
The two things are not connected.
Or are we only allowed to think and feel one thing at a time now?
I bet the poor woman will be hounded until she breaks.
JK2006 wrote: I think times are changing Amanda. As more and more people start seeing the False Allegations Industry for what it is, the likelihood of a major court case exposing the "enablers" rises.
The resistance is high though.
One of Hedda's ( for it is she)new found conservatism (not the current loopy "free market corporatism") is that the false allegations business is still rampant in Australia, probably New Zealand as well. Basically anywhere the Brits have had their dirty Puritan fingers (USA !)
IE: The persecution of George Pell (so awaiting the coming prosecutions in Iraly which my Italian pal says will drop time bombs), the ghastly Oz "50 Minutes" and it's Lords Ladies etc claptrap where every "witness" has now bee discredited.
The appalling manner in which all Australian media to a man / woman failed to print the story of discredited and accused rapist Peter Saunders who (whilst never having met the man) was widely reported in his false accusation "Cardinal Pell is a psychopath" and so much more.
The fact that the odious Tom Watson is given a well paid berth in of ll places, the music industry.
Hell hath no Fury like a Media Gack Scorned.
The media will fight tooth and nail to keep the convictions coming but then like the hackery they are, turn on sixpence and go the opposite way.