cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Go to bottomPost New TopicPost Reply
TOPIC: "Irreversible" says Boris
#210546
"Irreversible" says Boris 4 Years ago  
That's from Monday. Free travel; no quarantine; whoops. Not France. Reversed. God he's appalling.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#210556
Green Man

Re:"Irreversible" says Boris 4 Years ago  
The French did a major march today. Funny how the media avoided it apart from RT.

francais.rt.com/france/88801-manifestati...sanitaire-en-continu
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#210572
Peter

Re:"Irreversible" says Boris 4 Years ago  
"15,537 new daily symptomatic cases in partly or fully vaccinated. Last week it was 11,084 (up 40%). With cases in the vaccinated group continuing to rise, the number of new cases in the vaccinated population is set to overtake the unvaccinated in the coming days." covid.joinzoe.com/post/new-cases-plateau-aead-of-freedom-day

What is the point of health passes if already vaccinated people can still become symptomatic and thus spread the virus? Or am I not understanding the bleeding obvious?
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#210575
Re:"Irreversible" says Boris 4 Years ago  
Yes vaccinated people will still get and spread the trivial virus just as they get and spread colds and flu; totally natural, infectious diseases (we don't test for colds or flu - why would we?). And vaccinated people will get very few serious symptoms. With media hype, of course, many will flood hospitals with mild sore throats, of course. The gullibles are REALLY stupid. They even believe the naked Emperor is wearing a fabulous new suit.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#210579
Wyot

Re: 4 Years ago  
Peter wrote:


What is the point of health passes if already vaccinated people can still become symptomatic and thus spread the virus? Or am I not understanding the bleeding obvious?


We can't be sure, of course, because there is no honesty on the subject. But I suspect the vaccine push is about getting as many vaccinated as possible to lower "with Covid" death counts; and the vaccine is doing that. It is not about not being infectious. If the media stopped covering Covid with such addicted fervour, then politicians would be able to stop banging on about it...
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#210588
Wyot

Re: 4 Years ago  
Johnson and his team have no political judgment whatsoever, hence the u-turn:

www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-57879730

How did they think dodging self-isolaton would play out? I mean I don't give a shit what they do but the lack of judgment is astonishing...
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#210591
Honey

Re: 4 Years ago  
Wyot wrote:
Peter wrote:


What is the point of health passes if already vaccinated people can still become symptomatic and thus spread the virus? Or am I not understanding the bleeding obvious?


We can't be sure, of course, because there is no honesty on the subject. But I suspect the vaccine push is about getting as many vaccinated as possible to lower "with Covid" death counts; and the vaccine is doing that. It is not about not being infectious. If the media stopped covering Covid with such addicted fervour, then politicians would be able to stop banging on about it...


If the vaccines are lowering the "with" covid deaths, it indicates that they were always "because of" not "with".
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#210594
Wyot

Re: 4 Years ago  
Honey wrote:
[quote]Wyot wrote:
[quote]Peter wrote:



If the vaccines are lowering the "with" covid deaths, it indicates that they were always "because of" not "with".


No it doesn't; it just means less people are ending up in hospital because they are not getting so seriously ill with, e.g, a combination of diabetes & Covid.

We know Covid exacerbated existing conditions and killed some numbers as a result. No arguing with the "with". The person who died who was 23 stone with a load of health complications, died because of both Covid AND their health condition, which would have killed them one way or another anyway.

That person did not die "of Covid" in itself.

Though not much of a comfort to them I realise....
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#210605
Green Man

Re: 4 Years ago  
Wyot wrote:
[quote]Honey wrote:
[quote]Wyot wrote:
Peter wrote:



If the vaccines are lowering the "with" covid deaths, it indicates that they were always "because of" not "with".


No it doesn't; it just means less people are ending up in hospital because they are not getting so seriously ill with, e.g, a combination of diabetes & Covid.

We know Covid exacerbated existing conditions and killed some numbers as a result. No arguing with the "with". The person who died who was 23 stone with a load of health complications, died because of both Covid AND their health condition, which would have killed them one way or another anyway.

That person did not die "of Covid" in itself.

Though not much of a comfort to them I realise....


Sounds like Barney is back in the basement.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#210616
Honey

Re: 4 Years ago  
Green Man wrote:
[quote]Wyot wrote:
[quote]Honey wrote:
Wyot wrote:
Peter wrote:



If the vaccines are lowering the "with" covid deaths, it indicates that they were always "because of" not "with".


No it doesn't; it just means less people are ending up in hospital because they are not getting so seriously ill with, e.g, a combination of diabetes & Covid.

We know Covid exacerbated existing conditions and killed some numbers as a result. No arguing with the "with". The person who died who was 23 stone with a load of health complications, died because of both Covid AND their health condition, which would have killed them one way or another anyway.

That person did not die "of Covid" in itself.

Though not much of a comfort to them I realise....


Sounds like Barney is back in the basement.


He never left. Just got smarter.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#210618
Wyot

Re: 4 Years ago  
Honey wrote:
[quote]Green Man wrote:
[quote]Wyot wrote:
Honey wrote:
Wyot wrote:
Peter wrote:



If the vaccines are lowering the "with" covid deaths, it indicates that they were always "because of" not "with".


No it doesn't; it just means less people are ending up in hospital because they are not getting so seriously ill with, e.g, a combination of diabetes & Covid.

We know Covid exacerbated existing conditions and killed some numbers as a result. No arguing with the "with". The person who died who was 23 stone with a load of health complications, died because of both Covid AND their health condition, which would have killed them one way or another anyway.

That person did not die "of Covid" in itself.

Though not much of a comfort to them I realise....


Sounds like Barney is back in the basement.


He never left. Just got smarter.


Yes there was no way that tricksy-clever Honey post was Barney...
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#210627
Green Man

Re: 4 Years ago  
Irreversible damage caused by the vaccine. People who I know who have had the vaccine have ended in hospital due to allergic reactions, they still caught covid or still suffer the side affects from it. How about we sign a waiver saying "I rather take my chances" what happened to "my body my choice" or is that only for baby killers ?

dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/07/19/spanish-res...s-of-graphene-oxide/
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#210641
Honey

Re: 4 Years ago  
Green Man wrote:
Irreversible damage caused by the vaccine. People who I know who have had the vaccine have ended in hospital due to allergic reactions, they still caught covid or still suffer the side affects from it. How about we sign a waiver saying "I rather take my chances" what happened to "my body my choice" or is that only for baby killers ?

dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/07/19/spanish-res...s-of-graphene-oxide/


It is bollocks. We would be dead already.

How many people do you know PERSONALLY, not online, who have had a reaction and been hospitalised because of it?

And what was the time frame between them having the vaccine and being diagnosed with covid?

Don't have it if you don't want it, Greenman. But please don't decide based on unverifiable information from nutters online.
(except me! )
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#210642
Wyot

Re: 4 Years ago  
Green Man wrote:
Irreversible damage caused by the vaccine. People who I know who have had the vaccine have ended in hospital due to allergic reactions, they still caught covid or still suffer the side affects from it. How about we sign a waiver saying "I rather take my chances" what happened to "my body my choice" or is that only for baby killers ?

dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/07/19/spanish-res...s-of-graphene-oxide/


Highly suspect GM. The link to the report doesn't link to anything, the credentials of the researchers aren't stated, the "research" hasn't been peer-reviewed or published in any established journal, the University of Almeria, where the research allegedly originated, has distanced itself from the research.

www.forbes.com/sites/brucelee/2021/07/10...upported-claims/amp/

My question as well when I see this stuff: why? Why would some cabal wish to murder most of the population (this can be the only motive surely for mass injecting us with deadly toxins?) Just, why!? It leaves no one to make money from or rule over...

Having said this I am in total agreement with you that people should be able to choose; and not discriminted against if they don't take it.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#210657
Green Man

Re: 4 Years ago  
Honey wrote:
Green Man wrote:
Irreversible damage caused by the vaccine. People who I know who have had the vaccine have ended in hospital due to allergic reactions, they still caught covid or still suffer the side affects from it. How about we sign a waiver saying "I rather take my chances" what happened to "my body my choice" or is that only for baby killers ?

dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/07/19/spanish-res...s-of-graphene-oxide/


It is bollocks. We would be dead already.

How many people do you know PERSONALLY, not online, who have had a reaction and been hospitalised because of it?

And what was the time frame between them having the vaccine and being diagnosed with covid?

Don't have it if you don't want it, Greenman. But please don't decide based on unverifiable information from nutters online.
(except me! )


15 so far both family and friends have been infectedwithvaccines. I have proper friends who are human, who I meet up and go for a drink with. In USA you are looking at another 10 with similar affects. My daughters have refused their vaccines.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#210665
Honey

Re: 4 Years ago  
Green Man wrote:
Honey wrote:
Green Man wrote:
Irreversible damage caused by the vaccine. People who I know who have had the vaccine have ended in hospital due to allergic reactions, they still caught covid or still suffer the side affects from it. How about we sign a waiver saying "I rather take my chances" what happened to "my body my choice" or is that only for baby killers ?

dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/07/19/spanish-res...s-of-graphene-oxide/


It is bollocks. We would be dead already.

How many people do you know PERSONALLY, not online, who have had a reaction and been hospitalised because of it?

And what was the time frame between them having the vaccine and being diagnosed with covid?

Don't have it if you don't want it, Greenman. But please don't decide based on unverifiable information from nutters online.
(except me! )


15 so far both family and friends have been infectedwithvaccines. I have proper friends who are human, who I meet up and go for a drink with. In USA you are looking at another 10 with similar affects. My daughters have refused their vaccines.


I wasnt implying that you had no friends, Greenman (though you wont be going in pubs with them come September) but people online can exaggerate or tell porkies.

Unless they were actually hospitalised with an allergic reaction to the vaccine, I would put it down to after effects of any vaccine like flu, but if you know them personally you must just be an unlucky bunch?
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#210678
Green Man

Re: 4 Years ago  
Honey wrote:
Green Man wrote:
Honey wrote:
Green Man wrote:
Irreversible damage caused by the vaccine. People who I know who have had the vaccine have ended in hospital due to allergic reactions, they still caught covid or still suffer the side affects from it. How about we sign a waiver saying "I rather take my chances" what happened to "my body my choice" or is that only for baby killers ?

dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/07/19/spanish-res...s-of-graphene-oxide/


It is bollocks. We would be dead already.

How many people do you know PERSONALLY, not online, who have had a reaction and been hospitalised because of it?

And what was the time frame between them having the vaccine and being diagnosed with covid?

Don't have it if you don't want it, Greenman. But please don't decide based on unverifiable information from nutters online.
(except me! )


15 so far both family and friends have been infectedwithvaccines. I have proper friends who are human, who I meet up and go for a drink with. In USA you are looking at another 10 with similar affects. My daughters have refused their vaccines.


I wasnt implying that you had no friends, Greenman (though you wont be going in pubs with them come September) but people online can exaggerate or tell porkies.

Unless they were actually hospitalised with an allergic reaction to the vaccine, I would put it down to after effects of any vaccine like flu, but if you know them personally you must just be an unlucky bunch?



The only way to get get through this pandemic is to carry on and herd immunity.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
Go to topPost New TopicPost Reply