cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Go to bottomPost New TopicPost Reply
TOPIC: Murder v Child Porn
#21312
Sir A B. liar

Murder v Child Porn 16 Years, 9 Months ago  
can anyone suggest answers to the following questions :

1. A man is murdered by 7 people on the Tube - his work aquaintances organise a cover up and his boss claims no knowledge of anything.
Not a single charge is bought and no one takes any blame.......

2. A Rock Star views child porn and is given a Caution.

3. A Man who writes satire AGAINST the Blair Government views child porn and is put in Prison without bail and has false allegations made against him anononmously.

4. I also believe most of those found out by Operation Ore have been offered Cautions.

The pattern that has emerged for me over the last 10 years is a Police force driven by a Government stamping on the opposition.

By the law of averages a "Pro New Labour" high profile person should have been convicted through Operation Ore. Can anyone name such a person........ ??


We live in very strange times.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#21320
Re:Murder v Child Porn 16 Years, 9 Months ago  
Depends on the detail, given the information you have presented no meaningful conclusion or opinion can be given.

So to answer your first question; no, no-one can suggest answers to the following questions as given.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#21341
Sir A B.Liar

Re:Murder v Child Porn 16 Years, 9 Months ago  
I accept that making an actual judgement is hard but it seems very clear that the Courts are operating on very dodgy ground regarding all this "child porn - sex abuse" stuff.

It is quite clear that when put in front of a jury most "offenders" are aquitted unless they are famous. It is also true that if someone is famous and against New Labour they will handed charges and sentences far in excess of those who support New Labour.

I dont exactly see people Qing up on here to suggest any New Labour people who have been "done"
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#21345
Re:Murder v Child Porn 16 Years, 9 Months ago  
Sir A B.Liar wrote:
I accept that making an actual judgement is hard but it seems very clear that the Courts are operating on very dodgy ground regarding all this "child porn - sex abuse" stuff.

It is quite clear that when put in front of a jury most "offenders" are aquitted unless they are famous. It is also true that if someone is famous and against New Labour they will handed charges and sentences far in excess of those who support New Labour.

I dont exactly see people Qing up on here to suggest any New Labour people who have been "done"


It is far from "quite clear".

We only hear about the "celebrity trials" on national media. Without some idea of the actual acquittal figures there's no more to be said by me.

Why would anyone be "...Qing up on here to suggest any New Labour people who have been 'done"'?

I feel this issue is one that doesn't need anymore clouding.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#21362
Uberman

Re:Murder v Child Porn 16 Years, 9 Months ago  
Evidently the original post only has one question!

Without being absolutely specific my understanding from the early work of Ore is that there were a couple of politicos and one in the House of Lords caught in the trawl but were never processed.

Acquittals over criminal processes to do with child porn would be rare as the evidence is usually hard to overcome and if you got busted you'd need your wits about you to come up with a plausible or truthful defence such as:

- Someone used my credit card
- The computer is shared, go interview these people
- It must have been computer viruses
- My online user identity has been stolen

There are probably more but I have seen these as actual cases.

On the wider issue politicians will use control tactics to maintain power, they will indulge themselves and their sexual peccadilloes while in power, and they may well use sex based smears against those they do not like whether they be true or not.

What is also true is that while the UK tabloid media are a disgusting boil on the bum of humanity they know far more than they publish. Naturally they file it and use it as appropriate but there is plenty they do not say. In JK's own fall i saw a few mentions of how his 'leanings' were known inside the House of Murdoch when he took their silver.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
Go to topPost New TopicPost Reply