Is it considered a tabloid now?

Meghan Markle has urged everyone not to read the tabloids (As if we care what she thinks) and calls them "toxic".

But the most critical (of her and her horrid husband) seems to be The Times.

Honey wrote:
Is it considered a tabloid now?

Meghan Markle has urged everyone not to read the tabloids (As if we care what she thinks) and calls them "toxic".

But the most critical (of her and her horrid husband) seems to be The Times.

No one reads printed papers any more anyway Honey so she needn't worry.

It is nice, though, that she is trying to save us all from underestimating all the pain and trauma she and Harry have endured and continue to endure. As well as to not lose our faith in the purity of their motives in all regards. For sign-posting us towards the truth in a cynical post-truth world, the Duchess of Sussex (did she mention that?) deserves our unfaltering thanks...

Wyot wrote:
Honey wrote:
Is it considered a tabloid now?

Meghan Markle has urged everyone not to read the tabloids (As if we care what she thinks) and calls them "toxic".

But the most critical (of her and her horrid husband) seems to be The Times.

No one reads printed papers any more anyway Honey so she needn't worry.

It is nice, though, that she is trying to save us all from underestimating all the pain and trauma she and Harry have endured and continue to endure. As well as to not lose our faith in the purity of their motives in all regards. For sign-posting us towards the truth in a cynical post-truth world, the Duchess of Sussex (did she mention that?) deserves our unfaltering thanks...

I like to think that she makes the children call her The Duchess Of Sussex instead of Mummy.

Wyot wrote:
Honey wrote:
Is it considered a tabloid now?

Meghan Markle has urged everyone not to read the tabloids (As if we care what she thinks) and calls them "toxic".

But the most critical (of her and her horrid husband) seems to be The Times.

No one reads printed papers any more anyway Honey so she needn't worry.

It is nice, though, that she is trying to save us all from underestimating all the pain and trauma she and Harry have endured and continue to endure. As well as to not lose our faith in the purity of their motives in all regards. For sign-posting us towards the truth in a cynical post-truth world, the Duchess of Sussex (did she mention that?) deserves our unfaltering thanks...

Is there a Times Radio station now ?

Honey wrote:
Wyot wrote:
Honey wrote:
Is it considered a tabloid now?

Meghan Markle has urged everyone not to read the tabloids (As if we care what she thinks) and calls them "toxic".

But the most critical (of her and her horrid husband) seems to be The Times.

No one reads printed papers any more anyway Honey so she needn't worry.

It is nice, though, that she is trying to save us all from underestimating all the pain and trauma she and Harry have endured and continue to endure. As well as to not lose our faith in the purity of their motives in all regards. For sign-posting us towards the truth in a cynical post-truth world, the Duchess of Sussex (did she mention that?) deserves our unfaltering thanks...

I like to think that she makes the children call her The Duchess Of Sussex instead of Mummy.

Or her new title, "The Princess of Perjury"

Honey wrote:
Is it considered a tabloid now?

Meghan Markle has urged everyone not to read the tabloids (As if we care what she thinks) and calls them "toxic".

But the most critical (of her and her horrid husband) seems to be The Times.

dragged down market by Rupert Murdoch as is his wont.

was a terrific newspaper in it's day especially the Sunday Times when run by Harold Evans .

I have no dislike of Harry & Meghan but find them a bit dull and uninteresting.

They're in the right place..USA lurves celebrity of any kind.

Glanda Slagg wrote:
Honey wrote:
Is it considered a tabloid now?

Meghan Markle has urged everyone not to read the tabloids (As if we care what she thinks) and calls them "toxic".

But the most critical (of her and her horrid husband) seems to be The Times.

dragged down market by Rupert Murdoch as is his wont.

was a terrific newspaper in it's day especially the Sunday Times when run by Harold Evans .

I have no dislike of Harry & Meghan but find them a bit dull and uninteresting.

They're in the right place..USA lurves celebrity of any kind.

Not always. They were heckled and told to Eff off home the other day at the memorial thing.

I think them playing "God save the Queen" and letting an Englishman hand out medals to American soldiers might have been a bit much to stomach for some.

Honey wrote:
[quote]Glanda Slagg wrote:
[quote]Honey wrote:


Not always. They were heckled and told to Eff off home the other day at the memorial thing.



Their star is seriously on the wane in the US which have not fallen for them; so expect more toxic attention-seeking shit at home very soon...The Queen is (reading between the lines) on her way out and things a few months after that will get very unpleasant indeed....

Hope I am wrong...