IMPORTANT NOTE: You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
|
Home Forums |
TOPIC: Dick goes
|
|
Dick goes 3 Years, 5 Months ago
|
|
And I have to say - I like her and think she's a good cop. Yet again, here we see simplistic thinking. It's police that are going wrong. Not one person; the entire system. That was why George Floyd died in Minneapolis. That was why Wayne Couzens got away with it for so long. That was why Deniz Corday, Rob Randall and Laurence Pollinger died. That was why Levi Belfield got away after murdering Millie Dowler to kill other girls. That was why Port was allowed to kill more boys. That was why three Deepcut soldiers died. It's POLICE and training and bosses and the system that are wrong. Not one person. Just watch police continue to decline, with or without Dick.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
Last Edit: 2022/02/10 21:36 By JK2006.
|
|
|
|
Re:Dick goes 3 Years, 5 Months ago
|
|
Why? The answer is clear - media coverage. Who runs the country? The media. But the big problem is the same as every time - simplification. People cannot understand that the problem is leadership in police; training, discipline, correction, removal of crooks, the system. It was NOT Dick's fault and our ghastly Mayor just wanted to thumb his nose at the Tories. Take That Priti! Cosmetic changes will make no difference. It's a huge, global problem. When something grows, problems grow. The young NHS was far better than the current NHS. Old cops were far better than current cops. Size brings in bad apples and (worst of all) incompetents. Like everywhere, when your priority in bring in new officers is "make them female, Muslims, different skin colours, disabled" instead of any good, you'll get incompetents or criminals brought in and promoted. The more bent they are, the faster they rise.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Re:Dick goes 3 Years, 5 Months ago
|
|
JK2006 wrote:
Why? The answer is clear - media coverage.
That's not really the answer, JK. There was MASSIVE media effort to get Dick sacked after the Carl Beech revelations. Then there was a second intense campaign, led by the Mail (which really went for it), when the Gambo call for her to go was launched. Then there was a third big call for her to go before she could be given a further period in charge. Huge front page demands, massive features inside, day after day. And she survived it.
So we can't just say it was the media. The media FAILED. The media demanded her head and she went on to be made a dame and get her position renewed! The media got its teeth kicked in. Indeed, her past few years in office have shown how impotent the media still can be when the Establishment doesn't fancy complying.
So that's why I find it curious. Why now?
The hypocrisy of the mayor is plain to see. If he found it that easy to get rid of her, just by suddenly saying 'I don't support you,' why on earth didn't he do it when half the nation seemed to be baying for her blood?
If anything, the media, having been embarrassed to see their big campaigns fail, had recently seemed miserably fatalistic about her continuing. So the media was not the major mover here.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|