www.gbnews.uk/news/transgender-police-of...guidance-says/269009

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1070332...male-say-police.html


Remember give people an inch they take a mile. You would of thought the police would be up in arms especially the female colleagues, or are they scared to say anything?


You would thought since cases like Sarah Everhard and Paul Storey. The police would change tactics to protect women.

My partner is an ex-copper and she has a lot of stories to tell. There was toxicity in the Garda but not as bad as some of the constabularies. (Not my words)

Still own nothing not even dignity.

Green Man wrote:
My partner is an ex-copper and she has a lot of stories to tell. There was toxicity in the Garda but not as bad as some of the constabularies.


For 100 years now the Garda(i) have been the state police service of the Republic of Ireland. These days, drugs are their main problem.

Too often, over those years, a major factor in the investigation of a crime was the religion on the suspect.

Most members of the Gardai are/were Catholic. And took great joy in arresting Protestants, which was one reason for the troubles.

Trevor wrote:
Green Man wrote:
My partner is an ex-copper and she has a lot of stories to tell. There was toxicity in the Garda but not as bad as some of the constabularies.


For 100 years now the Garda(i) have been the state police service of the Republic of Ireland. These days, drugs are their main problem.

Too often, over those years, a major factor in the investigation of a crime was the religion on the suspect.

Most members of the Gardai are/were Catholic. And took great joy in arresting Protestants, which was one reason for the troubles.

My partner is an atheist like me. We don't talk about religion - I don't know about her ex-employers/employees as I don't know them personally.

Stalin was right about banning religion but wrong on everything else.

Feminism has been defeated by the mysoginism implicit in "equalising" men as women regardless of biology. A few brave souls like Greer speak out, the rest have sold their sisters down the river.

Women can't be equalised in the same way as they are physically less strong, and generally not sexually aggressive (mind you, I have met a couple... ).

Which is the point: women are different to men, at a genetic level. To deny this is to deny women their individual validity. Try denying the individual validity (in public) of the 0.0003%, of the population of who are aggressively trans (i.e a few bone headed male aggressors in dresses) and see what happens.

Green Man wrote:
[quote]Trevor wrote:
[quote]Green Man wrote:


Stalin was right about banning religion but wrong on everything else.

No he was wrong on that too.

Religion is just an ancient way humans misunderstand patterns and over inflate their own sense of cosmic importance. But you can't ban people out of that kind of shit.

Consider the millions of atheists who "thought" in a religious way about Covid. Unlinked patterns about lockdowns presented as "the science" (the good book?), no proportion in sense of self in relation to the threat. Whitty &, Valance even stood in front of what looked suspiciously like pulpits as they droned through their sermons/slides...

No, give me religious religions not secular religions any day; at least the religious answer to a power higher than the BBC or the WHO; and put on Easter egg hunts for kids...

Wyot wrote:
[quote]Green Man wrote:
[quote]Trevor wrote:
Green Man wrote:


Stalin was right about banning religion but wrong on everything else.

No he was wrong on that too.

Religion is just an ancient way humans misunderstand patterns and over inflate their own sense of cosmic importance. But you can't ban people out of that kind of shit.

Consider the millions of atheists who "thought" in a religious way about Covid. Unlinked patterns about lockdowns presented as "the science" (the good book?), no proportion in sense of self in relation to the threat. Whitty &, Valance even stood in front of what looked suspiciously like pulpits as they droned through their sermons/slides...

No, give me religious religions not secular religions any day; at least the religious answer to a power higher than the BBC or the WHO; and put on Easter egg hunts for kids...

Give me a thousand conspiracy theorists and a thousand atheists any time Wyot.

Wyot wrote:
Feminism has been defeated by the mysoginism implicit in "equalising" men as women regardless of biology. A few brave souls like Greer speak out, the rest have sold their sisters down the river.

Women can't be equalised in the same way as they are physically less strong, and generally not sexually aggressive (mind you, I have met a couple... ).

Which is the point: women are different to men, at a genetic level. To deny this is to deny women their individual validity. Try denying the individual validity (in public) of the 0.0003%, of the population of who are aggressively trans (i.e a few bone headed male aggressors in dresses) and see what happens.


So now a bloke can how have in a ladies prison. Sounds like I should of played my cards right when I had my stint inside.

www.foxnews.com/us/new-jersey-women-pris...-transgender-inmates

Green Man wrote:
Wyot wrote:
Feminism has been defeated by the mysoginism implicit in "equalising" men as women regardless of biology. A few brave souls like Greer speak out, the rest have sold their sisters down the river.

Women can't be equalised in the same way as they are physically less strong, and generally not sexually aggressive (mind you, I have met a couple... ).

Which is the point: women are different to men, at a genetic level. To deny this is to deny women their individual validity. Try denying the individual validity (in public) of the 0.0003%, of the population of who are aggressively trans (i.e a few bone headed male aggressors in dresses) and see what happens.


So now a bloke can how have in a ladies prison. Sounds like I should of played my cards right when I had my stint inside.

www.foxnews.com/us/new-jersey-women-pris...-transgender-inmates

Exactly. Anybody can call themselves Sandra and that's that.

No matter what you chop off, call yourself or wear, if the good lord made you male you stay male.

I am very happy to humour people who want to "live as the opposite sex" (translated- Perform within artificial stereotypes) if life is easier for them, but not if I have to give up my rights and safety, and face a penalty for not telling lies.

But most of the aggression is coming from a small group of misogynistic men who are autogynephilic.
People can have whatever fetish thy want, but why am I forced to join in?

Part of the fetish is exposing themselves and masturbating in women's spaces, and the idea that women should accept this, and be called names if they don't pretend to like it, is absurd.

Honey wrote:
Green Man wrote:
Wyot wrote:
Feminism has been defeated by the mysoginism implicit in "equalising" men as women regardless of biology. A few brave souls like Greer speak out, the rest have sold their sisters down the river.

Women can't be equalised in the same way as they are physically less strong, and generally not sexually aggressive (mind you, I have met a couple... ).

Which is the point: women are different to men, at a genetic level. To deny this is to deny women their individual validity. Try denying the individual validity (in public) of the 0.0003%, of the population of who are aggressively trans (i.e a few bone headed male aggressors in dresses) and see what happens.


So now a bloke can how have in a ladies prison. Sounds like I should of played my cards right when I had my stint inside.

www.foxnews.com/us/new-jersey-women-pris...-transgender-inmates

Exactly. Anybody can call themselves Sandra and that's that.

No matter what you chop off, call yourself or wear, if the good lord made you male you stay male.

I am very happy to humour people who want to "live as the opposite sex" (translated- Perform within artificial stereotypes) if life is easier for them, but not if I have to give up my rights and safety, and face a penalty for not telling lies.

But most of the aggression is coming from a small group of misogynistic men who are autogynephilic.
People can have whatever fetish thy want, but why am I forced to join in?

Part of the fetish is exposing themselves and masturbating in women's spaces, and the idea that women should accept this, and be called names if they don't pretend to like it, is absurd.


Yet, women demand safe spaces we gave them that and rightly so. However it shouldn't be abused whatsoever. Don't get me started on the non- binary nonsense.

I wouldn't want my daughters to have some bloke in a skirt loitering in the changing rooms in a clothes shop. Just like any sensible woman wouldn't want to be looked at whilst getting changed.

The left have now backed themselves in a corner and have no idea what to do without offending people, however they are offending women. (ones with wombs, breasts, uterus, vaginas, menopausal or the ones who menustrate )

If Keir Starmer has no idea what a woman is then DNA testing needs to be done.

Green Man wrote:
Honey wrote:
Green Man wrote:
Wyot wrote:
Feminism has been defeated by the mysoginism implicit in "equalising" men as women regardless of biology. A few brave souls like Greer speak out, the rest have sold their sisters down the river.

Women can't be equalised in the same way as they are physically less strong, and generally not sexually aggressive (mind you, I have met a couple... ).

Which is the point: women are different to men, at a genetic level. To deny this is to deny women their individual validity. Try denying the individual validity (in public) of the 0.0003%, of the population of who are aggressively trans (i.e a few bone headed male aggressors in dresses) and see what happens.


So now a bloke can how have in a ladies prison. Sounds like I should of played my cards right when I had my stint inside.

www.foxnews.com/us/new-jersey-women-pris...-transgender-inmates

Exactly. Anybody can call themselves Sandra and that's that.

No matter what you chop off, call yourself or wear, if the good lord made you male you stay male.

I am very happy to humour people who want to "live as the opposite sex" (translated- Perform within artificial stereotypes) if life is easier for them, but not if I have to give up my rights and safety, and face a penalty for not telling lies.

But most of the aggression is coming from a small group of misogynistic men who are autogynephilic.
People can have whatever fetish thy want, but why am I forced to join in?

Part of the fetish is exposing themselves and masturbating in women's spaces, and the idea that women should accept this, and be called names if they don't pretend to like it, is absurd.


Yet, women demand safe spaces we gave them that and rightly so. However it shouldn't be abused whatsoever. Don't get me started on the non- binary nonsense.

I wouldn't want my daughters to have some bloke in a skirt loitering in the changing rooms in a clothes shop. Just like any sensible woman wouldn't want to be looked at whilst getting changed.

The left have now backed themselves in a corner and have no idea what to do without offending people, however they are offending women. (ones with wombs, breasts, uterus, vaginas, menopausal or the ones who menustrate )

If Keir Starmer has no idea what a woman is then DNA testing needs to be done.

If Keir Starmer has no idea what a woman is, Head testing needs to be done!
He is a simpleton.

I don't know any bloke in my social circles who were treated for cervical cancer.



I don't any biological woman with a junk either.




I should be Keir's private tutor. Look Keir a no nonsense sex ed video for you and with pictures !