why is Mike Tyson not the
"disgraced Mike Tyson" in newspaper tales and TV reports?
Why is his serious rape conviction never mentioned in articles that simple label him as a "world champion" boxer?
Why is he invited to conferences etc..
as a convicted rapist..even to Australia about 5 years ago where he attended charity events and people paid good money to be snapped with a convicted criminal (drug convictions too) ?
(
David Icke..who I loathe,

was banned from entering Oz 3 years ago. Icke has never been convicted of anything)
Now.. I'm of the belief once someone has served their sentence..whether their sex assault conviction was real or a False Accusation, is entitled and should be able to re-enter society as a free person with all rights and dignity restored.
Is it because Tyson is a sport's star and the media thrives on sport so in his case, he is exempt from the usual ratbag monikers they attach to those they cherry pick to demonise even after they have done their penance?
It's a perfect example of how our media is now riddled with Glenda Slaggs & Phil Spaces who wield the power to create or destroy at will.
