cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Go to bottomPost New TopicPost Reply
TOPIC: More on False Accusers
#221916
More on False Accusers 3 Years, 1 Month ago  
More thoughts which may benefit those going through the hell that is the False Allegations Industry which I predicted (correctly) in 2000 would become the growth crime industry of this century.

These are specific to my situation but take them generally - then apply the thought process to your own situation.

POLICE CRIMINALITY
As we’re fast learning, police - often with the best intentions - have decided to break the law in the pursuit of a conviction. I’m not against this; in the good old SWEENEY days, the best cops nabbed the worst villains by doing exactly that. My appeal against my wrongful conviction in 2001 is still proceeding and every day I come across new evidence of wrong doing. Regulars may remember I posted a document from Surrey Police about the 29 mental institutions and rehab units that housed my first false accuser (I was found Not Guilty of his charges and he “bravely waived” his anonymity years ago in return for a cheque from The Sun) - Max Clifford’s client.
This shows that police investigated all 29 in 2001 - found he had never once mentioned my name and, instead of disclosing this to my defence, as they should have done, destroyed the findings and almost all traces of them. This was not just Failure to Disclose. It was a deliberate (and successful) Attempt To Pervert The Course Of Justice.

WITNESSES
I’ve told elsewhere about the man who swore on oath he had only met me once (his answer to the cop taking his statement asking if he’d had any further contact “No; why would I have?”) almost collapsing in the witness box at trial when he gathered we’d contacted his mother who knew he’d had many conversations and casual meetings with me and had even been sent promotion records.
Likewise the Claridges waiter, when his claim that he had been 14 was demolished by his own evidence and that of the hotel (who never employed anyone under 16), who we were not allowed to reveal to the jury had been a rent boy because we had no solid evidence, burst out “I was making £500 a week at Claridges” - in today’s money £2000 a week; £100,000 a year - in court and made the Judge look at me and raise an eyebrow.
But finding out people to confirm these lies can be exhausting and expensive (I could never have afforded it on Legal Aid had I not had decent lawyers and PI’s prepared to work really hard because they believed in me).

Another example - the man I’d taken to the Playboy club as an 18th Birthday treat, who swore he’d been 14. Can you imagine how hard it was to find a security person who’d worked at the club throughout the entire time (of both claimed dates) who was prepared to come to court and swear, on oath, that it was totally impossible for anyone to be allowed into the club without proof they were over 18? They would have lost their job and the club its licence. But it had to be done.

These are silly, trivial, unimportant things. But all absolutely vital to obtain an acquittal. It is very hard to prove you didn’t do something when the only evidence you DID is one person’s word. But if you can prove they lied again and again, you stand a chance. These are exactly the kind of tiny details a defendant needs to examine and find to stand any hope of acquittal. Until they change the law, the false accusers will keep winning.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#221925
Truthseeker

Re:More on False Accusers 3 Years, 1 Month ago  
Lest we forget, F.A.C.T./Falsely Accused Carers and Teachers with pilot group launched 30 years ago, in 1992.

F.A.C.T. developed from support groups for those falsely accused of abusing children in the residential care system. The first group was set up in North Wales in 1992, to support those falsely accused of abuse as part of the North Wales child abuse scandal first rumoured by the UK sensationalist press in 1991, following their very profitable 1980s fake 'Satanic Panic' witch-hunts.

F.A.C.T. itself was set up in late 1999, following allegations of abuse made across North West England, notably at the St George's School in Formby, Merseyside, where one of those accused and later cleared of all charges (when the false accusers failed to appear in court) was football manager Dave Jones. Plus, later cleared after being jailed Basil Williams-Rigsby and ex-GOOD cop Sgt Mike Lawson who, when finally freed in 2005 said on the Richard & Judy TV Show, paraphrased, "I know how these corrupt operations are made to work, and you haven't heard the last of this." (So watch out, ex-BAD cop MWT!)

Several other local groups later merged to form the national organisation F.A.C.T. which has submitted evidence to several inquiries into alleged child abuse and the increasingly questionable 'UK criminal justice system'.

In 2005, Wrexham Council refused permission for a conference, arranged by F.A.C.T. at which cultural historian (the late) RICHARD WEBSTER was to have been the main speaker at the former Bryn Estyn children's home following the publication of his, "THE SECRET OF BRYN ESTYN: THE MAKING OF A MODERN WITCH HUNT"; Orwell Press, February 2005.

In November 2012 F.A.C.T. strongly criticised what it called "false allegations and wrongful convictions" in relation to the North Wales child abuse scandal and many more in modern Britain.

Further background: In 1991 reports began to appear in the UK sensible and sensationalist press falsely claiming that Bryn Estyn, a home for adolescent boys on the outskirts of Wrexham, lay at the centre of a 'network of evil' paedophile ring whose members included a senior North Wales police officer. A massive investigation was launched and early in the morning of 15 March 1992, 40 police officers took up positions in streets in and around Wrexham. As dawn broke they swooped down on their suspects' homes and arrested sixteen men and one woman. All but one had worked at the Bryn Estyn care home for adolescent boys on the outskirts of Wrexham.

According to, all unsubstantiated, reports Bryn Estyn had lain at the centre of a network of evil conspiracy which supposedly involved the extensive homosexual abuse of adolescent boys by a paedophile ring, whose members terrorised their victims and subjected them to a regime of violence and brutality; the now familiar 'Carl Beech' bullshit!

A Witch Hunt, which, over the next ten years, spread throughout Britain with thousands falsely accused, hundreds arrested, and UK prisons began to fill up with a majority wrongly convicted, and some rightly jailed.

Had Britain at last faced up to a horrifying reality? Or was there another, even more disturbing story that remained to be uncovered, where leading journalists themselves helped to set in motion a new kind of modern Witch Hunt that was unable, or still unwilling, to distinguish between a few guilty and the many innocent?

www.amazon.com/Secret-Bryn-Estyn-Making-Modern/dp/0951592246
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#221950
Re:More on False Accusers 3 Years, 1 Month ago  
Amber Heard is clearly a "less good actor" than Johnny Depp (see the Bill Roache Coronation Street trial when Anne Whyte made a similar mistake in her summing up) but it's interesting that what really floored her were the exaggerations and detail she provided that proved she lied. That is the point I make above. False Accusers often do the same. Some even believe their own lies having convinced themselves (often with abuse of drink or drugs) and stupidly think "this cannot be exposed - nobody else knows the truth" when the reality is - yes, the truth can be found.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#221953
Re:More on False Accusers 3 Years, 1 Month ago  
And do read this... "very rare"??? Pull the other one CPS. That last person to use that quote was Peter Saunders (ex NAPAC) later exposed as a sex abuser of vulnerable victims.

www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/feb/06/...iam-roache-acquitted
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#222018
Truthseeker

Re:More on False Accusers 3 Years, 1 Month ago  
Vincent DeYoung's review of "The Secret of Bryn Estyn" 5.0 out of 5 stars; reviewed in the United States on December 13, 2014

Richard Webster's account of this particular panic is extremely well documented and researched. It gives the entire life history of a monstrous injustice from its conception.

However, this awful travesty has not ended, but has been resurrected with the current Operation Palial which began in 2012 with the fantasies of a mental patient since discredited, but where money is involved victims will crawl out of the woodwork.

Unfortunately Richard Webster is dead. But this witch hunt lives on, immortal. If you want a true horror story, read the current convictions which are being handed out to innocent men in the UK as I write.

No proof beyond fantastic stories are needed to deprive a man or woman of their freedom.

Allegations of child sex abuse are impossible to defend against.

Read this book and...you will think it is Nazi Germany all over again.

wikispooks.com/wiki/Carl_Beech
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
Go to topPost New TopicPost Reply