Absolutely NOT - Johnson, like Trump, has a number of terrible character flaws and has espoused some disastrous policies. I disagree with almost everything he's done. Like Trump I think he's a terrible leader and wish to God we had a decent one. But democracy no longer works and both Trump and Johnson have worked out (with help from people like Cummings as Blair had people like Campbell) how to dodge around the standard establishment ways of removing him. I admired Trump for his refusal to accept the election results. Whether right or wrong about them, his determination NOT to behave as previous Presidents behaved was admirable. He's made a career of fighting against the media (and manipulation of it). Media (pandering to a huge chunk of the public) told Twitter to ban him; they did. Disgraceful. Media is now urging Boris to go because of stupid, trivial mistakes (who CARES who gropes who in private clubs?). Instead of the serious, dreadful mistakes (stupid Brexit; stupid Covid) - because the WORST mistake would be giving in to media slogans and morality.

YES Boris should be replaced. NO - not for these reasons.

What I find distasteful this morning is the endless parade of cowardly shit bag MPs who have known exactly what Boris is like from day one now pretending to be outraged and resigning....

Boris should go for the lockdowns alone.

And the only reasons they got the jobs in the first place is a) they were pro Brexit or b) they were women or of minority race.

To me, the little gang with their knives in the buffoon's back are far worse than him.

Who the heck is the new health secretary? Some random from the bus stop?

Honey wrote:
To me, the little gang with their knives in the buffoon's back are far worse than him.

Who the heck is the new health secretary? Some random from the bus stop?

Nigel Farage made an interesting point that if there was snap election it would be a very low turn out. How many elections/by elections have there been since Brexit I have lost count ?

Keir Starmer is another moron, who does not know what a woman is. He broke his own lockdown rules with his own party, yet he wanted tougher lockdowns.

The UK only has Brexit in name only we still tied with the ECHR.



www.leicestermercury.co.uk/news/uk-world...er-slams-pms-4605675

What I find distasteful this morning is the endless parade of cowardly shit bag MPs who have known exactly what Boris is like from day one now pretending to be outraged and resigning

Spot on Wyot, maybe they got what they wanted from him like nice contracts during the 'Plandemic'. Covid is no longer profitable. Many MP's invest in companies abroad especially pharma.

nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/04/the-comp...the-coronavirus.html

expose-news.com/2021/01/27/mps-heavily-i...ceutical-industry/#:~:text=The%20Daily%20Expose%20can%20today%20reveal%20that%20a,healthcare%20firms%2C%20social%20care%20providers%20and%20pharmaceutical%20corporations.

I have a cunning plan.
Baldock for PM, at least he has a plan, unlike the rest who just want to be in power for their own egos.

Sadly, fom a very mediocre lot, Boris in the best option.

Green Man wrote:
The UK only has Brexit in name only we still tied with the ECHR

Nobody in the UK would argue with the human rights principles of the European courts.

Many though fail to see the logic in a part of the EU (Northern Ireland) remaining in the Single Market.

MalcolmY wrote:
Green Man wrote:
The UK only has Brexit in name only we still tied with the ECHR

Nobody in the UK would argue with the human rights principles of the European courts.

Many though fail to see the logic in a part of the EU (Northern Ireland) remaining in the Single Market.

Hence it's Brexit in name only. No one believed the government over the Rwanda plan but it cost the tax payers a lot money.

Are you still in your bedsit Barney or have you moved to an attic ?