Hard to know whether to feel pity or derision for Sir Cliff for having gone to such pains for decades to use a few brief dates with Sue Barker to portray himself as a straight guy who just didn't quite meet "the one":

www-dailymail-co-uk.cdn.ampproject.org/v...ichard-new-book.html

Who knows if this was about money (image) or something else. He also portays himself as strongly Christian. Is this real or for effect?

I have no idea or interest in his sexuality, and don't mean to imply anything untoward (what he was subjected to a few years back was a disgrace).

I just find it all rather peculiar; and have always found Sir Cliff peculiar/manufactured in his presentation.

Might just be me, of course.

He's actually a very nice, sweet man - remember; in those days it was impossible to be gay (and actually a crime resulting in prison and often suicide).

It's none of our business.

I don't care if he straight, gay, bi or even asexual.