He's skating on very thin ice with his own personal problems.

All it needs is for one of his victims to make a complaint and he's toast.

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1127016...nificant-person.html

He clearly believes in media exposure and would agree that once one victim of his comes forward, their claims should be publicised as it could bring many more out of the woodwork. There is a clear subplot in the Mail story. I wonder if they know something we don't about Mark Williams Thomas.

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6350331...lice-ruin-lives.html

Surely any reader of this latest "Exclusive Interview" can read between the lines? "I've already got half a dozen false accusers lined up for my TV Exposure when X dies and the death will provoke even more". Poor Mark Williams Thomas, knowing his credibility has been destroyed over the past ten years, is planning his next gold mine. But someone is waiting, knowing more about MWT than others, to make their own lethal claims against him and claim their thousands in compensation.

There's a great TV Exposure show to be made about THAT, media folk.

You see he's very cunning. If his "subject" is dead, like Savile, he is not breaking the law (attempting to pervert the course of justice) and also cannot be sued. So he can set up and organise people who he will tell to go to the police the moment X pops his (or her) clogs. Very clever; he can make even more of a fortune than he has through Savile. And his rubbish about Police and CPS refusing to prosecute innocent victims of false accusers can never be proved. He must be loathed by both.