a junior police officer at Surrey Police stumbled upon a liar making false allegations about a minor celebrity (me) at the prompting of a Public Relations person (Max Clifford) who the liar had approached with a story about sex abuse in the 1970s.
Clifford told him "you need a famous name" so the liar added MY name. Clifford then told him to go to Surrey Police and make a formal complaint.
The junior cop taking the man's statement was Mark Williams Thomas.
He realised this was a potential Goldmine. Celebrity perverts!
Sadly he was booted out of the police and had nothing to do with that prosecution (though he tried to benefit from it by offering names and contact details to the tabloids).
During his interview with the liar (oddly ON HIS OWN - pushing his partner cop away to having tea with the liar's wife who - to this day - found this odd) he gathered a list including many other celebrity names - mainly pop people, DJs and footballers.
I still have that list.
After a period of failure (he worked for a company cleaning pavements of chewing gum and earned the nickname GUMSHOE) and court appearances for BLACKMAIL (he was acquitted), he tried to set up further prosecutions but really hit pay dirt when, after Jimmy Savile's death, he "exposed" the dead minor celebrity on TV.
The man's name is Mark Williams Thomas.

Unbelievable? Read this story.

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6350331...lice-ruin-lives.html

Blame the trashy ITV for giving him a platform.

Would be a beautiful thing if MWT met the same fate as Max Clifford.

I suspect that most journalists won't look into this guy because it would be too much effort. On the other hand, some might be unable to find their arse with both hands, let alone begin to know how to find articles in the Daily Mail or other sources.

Recently the BBC's "flagship news and current affairs programme", the Today programme on Radio 4, gave a platform to the CEO of a self-described financial advisory firm that operates worldwide and "advises" its clients in such a way that they lose large chunks of their savings/pensions. Its treatment of clients and their money was the subject of a long article in the Sunday Times a few months ago and its CEO was recently fined and banned by the South African financial regulator from doing business there for five years, as reported by various sources easily found online. But the BBC doesn't seem to be aware of this, or even of its own 2010 Panorama investigation "Who took my pension?", which dipped a toe in the water into how the firm operates, showing how an offshoot had tricked a blind man out of a large chunk of his pension and how the firm itself is very "commission-driven" (putting it mildly). So they interviewed the CEO as a supposed property expert. He chuckled through the interview, probably unable to contain his glee at getting one over the BBC.

I greatly regret starting the exposure of Max Clifford especially as his sentence (consecutive not concurrent) was manifestly unfair and it was awful that he died in prison (which he must have hated; his character being nearly the total opposite to mine).

So I wouldn't wish that fate on anybody - not even my worst enemy and Clifford was far from that, as indeed, neither is Mark Williams Thomas.

But you cannot control Karma. He or she controls you.

When decent police officers see solid proof and evidence that a false accuser is lying, to continue a case to court is a crime. It is Attempting to Pervert the Course of Justice.

Example in my case - a False Accuser, when asked again and again if he'd had any further contact with me after the first and only time, replied, on oath, "No; why would I have?" - exact words. Then we found his mother, who said he'd had numerous phone calls from me and received several records in the post.

In court he went white and almost collapsed. He was furious we'd spoken to the mother. "Thank you so much" he said sarcastically.

But the police and CPS knew this (disclosure goes both ways).

So why did they allow him to step into the Witness Box and perjure himself?

And why were some of the bent cops allowed to keep their jobs (and even get promoted)?

Disgraceful. And by knowing this, and supporting the bent cops, their bosses should be sacked too.