UK_Mets wrote:
Am I alone in thinking that Rolf Harris was guilty of nothing more than behaving as people behaved in the 70s? The evidence from his trial seemed ludicrous, accusers not even being to name the city in which the alleged event took place, etc.
It’s heartbreaking to see him and his wife ostracised and in poor health, barely able to show their faces given all the joy Rolf brought to people over decades.
You're probably not alone in thinking that, though I'm not sure if men in the 1970s generally did go around molesting women or if that's just the impression created by all the allegations against elderly celebs. If you only met a celeb briefly and/or in public (or didn't), an allegation of groping is about as much as would be plausible, though funnily enough eyes, still cameras and film cameras never seem to have been fixed on the celeb at the time (well, there was that TOTP video of Jimmy Savile and the squirming young woman, but I'm not aware of anything with Rolf Harris). But if you do think that
any of the allegations against Rolf Harris were true, I suggest you read the book published in May by the private detective, William Merritt, a former New Zealand police detective, who worked with Rolf Harris's new defence team (headed by Stephen Vullo KC) in his second and third trials (acquitted/undecided jury) and appeal (one count overturned, i.e. the allegation that Rolf Harris molested a 7/8-year-old in an autograph queue (total invention, she had never even met him); sadly time and finances apparently didn't allow for William Merritt to thoroughly investigate the other allegations from the first trial, though he does address them in the book).
The paperback is only 10 pounds on Amazon and appears to be free on kindle. It has many five-star reviews from verified purchasers. It's well written and eye-opening.
Rolf Harris: The Defence Team’s Special Investigator reveals the Truth behind the Trials
Interview with William Merritt about the book