hedda wrote:
I'm no great fan nor do I dislike Harry & Meghan & believe the entire saga just adds o the Soap Opera the Royals have always been ( Good God-where would the media be without them).
One tale that went under the radar which sounds like a total LA publicist invention..that The Queen went on "bended knees literally" 
to beg him not to support Jeremy Corbyn.
Such a joke (she'd never get up) which makes me wonder what else is a fabrication. 
Well, it doesnt have to be factual, because that is not its purpose.
They can "say anything" according to the threat in "The Cut" .
It is chockfull of incidents that could not possibly have happened, and a load more which are unlikely, but the oddest thing is the account of his son's birth.
I have always assumed that the ever changing bump and "Birkenhead incident" when it fell down, was just a protective vest. In the photos, When it is down by her knees you can see an appropriate sized bump in the correct place too.
If it turns out the children
are by surrogate, it seems sensible to hide it, and stop them being forever labelled. Go Harry and Meghan!
But, why wouldn't you just do a quick google before writing a load of claptrap that is medically impossible about the birth?
We don't need to know the truth (nothing more boring than other peoples birth stories) let alone silly lies, but why does he encourage speculation about his children's place in the line of succession?
Forums 
