Just as media did a reverse ferret on Bent Cops when a few killers and rapist police officers started emerging, so the Industry has been followed by the Whiplash liars, the Holiday Illness liars, the Motor Fraud liars (600 million quid a year???) and now we need to start on the ENABLERS.

I still think it was wrong for Carl Beech to take all the punishment when others (Exaro; Lawyers; Cops) assisted, encouraged and colluded in his attempt to pervert the course of justice, for which he is serving 18 years in prison.

This year - let's get the ENABLERS. Yes, False Accusers too, when they are proved to be guilty of making false sworn statements on oath or committing perjury or deliberately, like Beech, attempting to pervert the course of justice. And COLLUDING in doing that, as so many spouses and friends do, often unintentionally, trying to back up and assist yet often proving their guilt in contradictions. My recent thread on innocent relatives giving evidence that proves, eventually, to be the downfall of their loved ones, has had thousands of views. This strikes a chord.

BEWARE! We are coming for you.

If numerous non-recent alleged sex crimes can be prosecuted with no evidence.

Then, more recent and non-recent proven False Allegations crimes enabled by bent-cops can all be prosecuted with much evidence, as in the Carl Beech proven case.

So that criminally corrupt police enablers are all subsequently prosecuted, convicted, publicly disgraced, and jailed.

Re-check "Indecent Assault", 1980, Roger Moody's account of a rare victory against illegal police tactics for false allegations, prosecutions and convictions, which they distortedly still self-justify as 'noble cause corruption'.

Roger had been falsely charged with indecent assault but only after a number of boys had been put under inhuman pressure by pro-active police to make false allegations and statements against him.
Psychologically brutal tactics and emotional blackmail included warning the boys seperately (all assumed to be 'vulnerable victims') that they would not be allowed home until they “admitted” that sexual acts had occurred. Corrupt police tricked and groomed them by falsely claiming that other boys had all complained, and that Roger had already confessed.

(Plus, since 1980, strong hints of large compensation payments are hugely corrupt bribery inducements made by deviously manipulative police. To ensure successful false allegations, statements, prosecutions, and convictions, plus populist career advancements.)

As with many similar, mostly unpublicised, corrupt cases before and since, false allegations and statements were duly extracted in this way and a deeply corrupt case was brought to court. Bravely, Roger admitted he was sexually attracted to boys but pleaded he was not guilty of any criminal offence. His rare candour in the witness box over his sexuality made a great impression on the jury because they accepted his truthful version of events and acquitted him.

Though, then as now, criminally corrupt police enablers were not subsequently prosecuted, convicted, publicly disgraced, and jailed.

www.goodreads.com/review/show/5322587648