cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Go to bottomPost New TopicPost Reply
TOPIC: Woke Glastonbury
#231298
Woke Glastonbury 2 Years, 3 Months ago  
Cancel the John Peel tent. Why? I'm going to start a July festival - the Corpses and Perverts Festival.

I shall find a large Unworthy Farm and use the Abba Voyage technology.

Main Stage headliners - Friday Gary Glitter; Saturday Cliff Richard; Sunday Bob Dylan.
All victims.
In the Crap and Plip Plop tent - R Kelly (virtual though he believes he can fly).
In the Age of Consent tent - Michael Jackson and Elvis.

Guest stars Freddie Mercury, George Michael, Aretha Franklin (you knew I was waiting), David Bowie.
Hosted by Jimmy Savile, John Peel, DLT...
Of course police will raid it and cart us all away in small boats to Rwanda.
But it will be worth it. GREAT MUSIC (unlike Papstonbury).
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#231299
Whole Truth

Re:Woke Glastonbury 2 Years, 3 Months ago  
Always respect true, not fake, victims.

Peel not just Rock/Pop but 9-yrs celebrated on brainy R.4 "Offspring/Home Truths" 1995-2004.

Now CANCELLED on COWARDLY sites, next up BBC/BritBrainCrap ?

www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/hometruths/

www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/hometruths/20041030_peel_tribute.shtml

www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/hometruths/20041030_from_you.shtml

Peel, groomer or GROOMED? In an interview with The Sunday Correspondent in 1989, Peel said: "Girls used to QUEUE UP outside. By and large not usually for sh*****g. Oral sex they were particularly keen on, I remember. One of my, er, regular customers, as it were, turned out to be 13, though she looked older.'

An interview originally published in The Herald in April 2004 stated that Peel admitted to sexual contact with 'an awful lot' of underage girls.

In an interview with The Guardian in 1975 while discussing women, Peel said: "All they wanted me to do was abuse them, sexually, which, of course, I was only too happy to do.'

QUEUED UP, surely to be aMused, not abused?

Time to CANCEL the 1885 vile-Victorian Age of Sex Consent EQUALISED to the Age of Criminal Responsibilty.

What is the lowest age of criminal responsibility in Europe?
There is no absolute minimum age set at which children become able to be held criminally responsible, but a child will usually be considered to have “discernment” from the ages of 8 or 10.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#231302
Wyot

Re:Woke Glastonbury 2 Years, 3 Months ago  
Whole Truth wrote:


What is the lowest age of criminal responsibility in Europe?
There is no absolute minimum age set at which children become able to be held criminally responsible, but a child will usually be considered to have “discernment” from the ages of 8 or 10.


I respect your right to advocate whatever you want WT. Clearly you feel this is a safe space to post this, and perhaps it is.

But I am posting this to distance myself totally from this notion. I am sure I am far from the only person who posts on this site (or just reads it) who finds the idea of adults having sex with pre pubescent 8 year old children abhorrent.

I would also point out that our host maintains his innocence of offences allegedly committed against much older young adults. And has successfully had such allegations discredited and dropped in Court.

From everything I have ever read here over several years now, you are alone on this one WT.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#231311
Honey

Re:Woke Glastonbury 2 Years, 3 Months ago  
Wyot wrote:
Whole Truth wrote:


What is the lowest age of criminal responsibility in Europe?
There is no absolute minimum age set at which children become able to be held criminally responsible, but a child will usually be considered to have “discernment” from the ages of 8 or 10.




I respect your right to advocate whatever you want WT. Clearly you feel this is a safe space to post this, and perhaps it is.

But I am posting this to distance myself totally from this notion. I am sure I am far from the only person who posts on this site (or just reads it) who finds the idea of adults having sex with pre pubescent 8 year old children abhorrent.

I would also point out that our host maintains his innocence of offences allegedly committed against much older young adults. And has successfully had such allegations discredited and dropped in Court.

From everything I have ever read here over several years now, you are alone on this one WT.


I echo all this, but, our host does himself no favours by including people who were either never charged, or proven innocent, in his imaginary line up.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#231312
Re:Woke Glastonbury 2 Years, 3 Months ago  
That's the point of the joke Honey!
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#231317
Green Man

Re:Woke Glastonbury 2 Years, 3 Months ago  
JK2006 wrote:
Cancel the John Peel tent. Why? I'm going to start a July festival - the Corpses and Perverts Festival.

I shall find a large Unworthy Farm and use the Abba Voyage technology.

Main Stage headliners - Friday Gary Glitter; Saturday Cliff Richard; Sunday Bob Dylan.
All victims.
In the Crap and Plip Plop tent - R Kelly (virtual though he believes he can fly).
In the Age of Consent tent - Michael Jackson and Elvis.

Guest stars Freddie Mercury, George Michael, Aretha Franklin (you knew I was waiting), David Bowie.
Hosted by Jimmy Savile, John Peel, DLT...
Of course police will raid it and cart us all away in small boats to Rwanda.
But it will be worth it. GREAT MUSIC (unlike Papstonbury).



Does that mean the Rolling Stones are cancelled?
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#231325
Green Man

Re:Woke Glastonbury 2 Years, 3 Months ago  
Wyot wrote:
Whole Truth wrote:


What is the lowest age of criminal responsibility in Europe?
There is no absolute minimum age set at which children become able to be held criminally responsible, but a child will usually be considered to have “discernment” from the ages of 8 or 10.


I respect your right to advocate whatever you want WT. Clearly you feel this is a safe space to post this, and perhaps it is.

But I am posting this to distance myself totally from this notion. I am sure I am far from the only person who posts on this site (or just reads it) who finds the idea of adults having sex with pre pubescent 8 year old children abhorrent.

I would also point out that our host maintains his innocence of offences allegedly committed against much older young adults. And has successfully had such allegations discredited and dropped in Court.

From everything I have ever read here over several years now, you are alone on this one WT.


WT, needs some professional help.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
Go to topPost New TopicPost Reply