Defined in Nuremberg as 'The Supreme Crimes'.

In Kuala Lumpur, after two years of investigation by the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission (KLWCC), a tribunal (the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal, or KLWCT) consisting of five judges with judicial and academic backgrounds reached a unanimous verdict that found George W Bush and Tony Blair guilty of crimes against peace, crimes against humanity, and genocide as a result of their roles in the Iraq War.

www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2011/11/28/ku...ush-and-blair-guilty

What rarely gets written about was how religiously (both ardent Christians) motivated they may well have been. Unlike with Thatcher and the Falklands, Blair can have been under no doubt that popular opinion in this country was against him. No, he was motivated by something else.

So much is written about financial motives, that the religious is largely ignored. Perhaps the religious (or certainly anything in this case more fervent than a gentle Anglicanism...) should be banned from high office on the basis of questionable rationality?

Wyot wrote: "So much is written about financial motives, that the religious is largely ignored. Perhaps the religious (or certainly anything in this case more fervent than a gentle Anglicanism...) should be banned from high office on the basis of questionable rationality?"

Anti-Christ Bush, boss of meek pawn Bliar, so called 'gentle Anglican Christians'. Both believe in the gross profit, vile insults to the gentle prophet.

Wasting TRILLIONS in much needed public money diverted to PROFIT the unelected Military Industrial Complex and re-construction companies like Dick Cheney's Halliburton, while endangering and sacrificing his own U.S. Troops and millions of innocents. "GEORGE W. BUSH, WAR CRIMINAL? The Bush Administration's Liability for 269 War Crimes" - by Professor Michael Haas.

Eminent jurists, professional legal organizations, and human rights monitors in this country and around the world have declared that President George W. Bush may be prosecuted as a war criminal for his overt and systematic violations of such international law as the Geneva and Hague Conventions and such US law as the War Crimes Act, the Anti-Torture Act, and federal assault laws.

Professor Michael Haas identifies and documents 269 specific war crimes under US and international law for which President Bush, senior officials and staff in his administration, and military officers under his command are liable to be prosecuted.

Professor Haas divides the 269 war crimes of the Bush administration into four classes: 6 war crimes committed in launching a war of aggression; 36 war crimes committed in the conduct of war; 175 war crimes committed in the treatment of prisoners; and 52 war crimes committed in postwar occupations.
For each of the 269 war crimes of the Bush administration,

Professor Haas gives chapter and verse in precise but non-technical language, including the specific acts deemed to be war crimes, the names of the officials deemed to be war criminals, and the exact language of the international or domestic laws violated by those officials. The author proceeds to consider the various US, international, and foreign tribunals in which the war crimes of Bush administration defendants may be tried under applicable bodies of law. He evaluates the real-world practicability of bringing cases against Bush and Bush officials in each of the possible venues.

Finally, Professor Haas weighs the legal, political, and humanitarian pros and cons of actually bringing Bush, and Bush officials to trial for war crimes.

www.abc-clio.com/products/c8109c/

Are you any relation to a former poster on here known as BR?