www.gbnews.com/news/male-blood-donor-tur...ay-refused-pregnancy


Are we living in Twin Peaks meets Twilight Zone?

Of course men can't get pregnant. If I was asked what my pronouns were in a doctors surgery or clinic. I would say are you blind or just stupid?

Then to waste time I would ask for an ultrasound, smear test and I will ask when my due date is. Not forgetting asking about menopause and HRT.

Ask stupid questions then stupid answers follow!

It is known the UK has a shortage of blood donor's, maybe because there are European countries pay for it. A biscuit and cup of tea won't do for a lot of people.

In Canada you can get up 65 dollars...which is about £40.

"Some trans activists insist it is possible for men to become pregnant, as they believe transgender men, who are biologically female, are male."



I am trying to un pick this statement from your link GM...

So the question is being asked because transgender (F to M) men remain biologically female? So the question appears to be the product of trans rights lunacy, but it is in fact being asked because biological females - regardless of any procedures - remain biological females.

The question is being asked precisely because it is impossible to alter one's biological sex.

Should it not be the trans lobby up in arms at the question? Or do we get too exercised about them because most of this stuff is just about people being able to use pronouns...

I genuinely am happy for anyone who feels that they are able to assume the gender that makes them most comfortable. And let's create a society that responds with toleration and compassion.

But let's stop torturing logic, twisting language and start being honest about what trans actually is and is not.

Otherwise we just fuel the haters with silly headlines like this, which are about nothing.

And the donor should have just chilled out, said he wasn't pregnant, donated and had his cup of tea.

(I would love to see Hancock/Galton & Simpson remake The Blood Donor in the trans era...)

Wyot wrote:
"Some trans activists insist it is possible for men to become pregnant, as they believe transgender men, who are biologically female, are male."



I am trying to un pick this statement from your link GM...

So the question is being asked because transgender (F to M) men remain biologically female? So the question appears to be the product of trans rights lunacy, but it is in fact being asked because biological females - regardless of any procedures - remain biological females.

The question is being asked precisely because it is impossible to alter one's biological sex.

Should it not be the trans lobby up in arms at the question? Or do we get too exercised about them because most of this stuff is just about people being able to use pronouns...

I genuinely am happy for anyone who feels that they are able to assume the gender that makes them most comfortable. And let's create a society that responds with toleration and compassion.

But let's stop torturing logic, twisting language and start being honest about what trans actually is and is not.

Otherwise we just fuel the haters with silly headlines like this, which are about nothing.

And the donor should have just chilled out, said he wasn't pregnant, donated and had his cup of tea.

(I would love to see Hancock/Galton & Simpson remake The Blood Donor in the trans era...)


If a nurse asked me if I am male, then I don't think they have the eyes for the medical profession.

Also changing sex is basically cosmetic surgery. It's a mental mindset that needs to be looked in to.

The man is a hero.
I don't understand why people think it is ok to be forced to lie?

Honey wrote:
The man is a hero.
I don't understand why people think it is ok to be forced to lie?

But he isn't being forced to lie Honey. He is being asked if he is pregnant, because women can undergo processes that lead them to call themselves men and appear to be men. He can reply no truthfully.

He is being asked this question because people can assume/"change" a gender, but not biological sex.

It is the latter point that causes all the conflict and confusion. As so many trans and commentators continue to pretend biological transference is possible.

So let people assume whatever gender they wish, but stop the stupidity of pretending that biology and chromosomes don't exist, as this question about pregnancy does (because women can't become men to the extent of being unable to be pregnant).

As does not allowing men who have parted company with their chopper to compete in women's sports.

It is the kind of question we need to restore sanity.

Wyot wrote:
Honey wrote:
The man is a hero.
I don't understand why people think it is ok to be forced to lie?

But he isn't being forced to lie Honey. He is being asked if he is pregnant, because women can undergo processes that lead them to call themselves men and appear to be men. He can reply no truthfully.

He is being asked this question because people can assume/"change" a gender, but not biological sex.

It is the latter point that causes all the conflict and confusion. As so many trans and commentators continue to pretend biological transference is possible.

So let people assume whatever gender they wish, but stop the stupidity of pretending that biology and chromosomes don't exist, as this question about pregnancy does (because women can't become men to the extent of being unable to be pregnant).

As does not allowing men who have parted company with their chopper to compete in women's sports.

It is the kind of question we need to restore sanity.

I am actually unaware of any male sport cheat without his chopper, but I expect there might be one or two of them.

You cant separate sex from gender without imposing the artificial "gender norms" onto those who know it is a load of tosh and don't want to take part, or simply come from a society with different gender norms.

So while it would be simple to just tick the box, I really think it is best that we don't go along with the crap.

Honey wrote:
[quote]Wyot wrote:
[quote]Honey wrote:


You cant separate sex from gender without imposing the artificial "gender norms" onto those who know it is a load of tosh and don't want to take part, or simply come from a society with different gender norms.

So while it would be simple to just tick the box, I really think it is best that we don't go along with the crap.

Interesting point about the subjectivity and imposition of gender norms Honey.

Like you, I wish it would all just go away - it is very tiresome and affects such a small percentage. There are so many more important issues, like the fucking potholes now blighting every road in Surrey, for one...

But while we have women acting and looking like men, I think we need to ask everyone whether they are pregnant when giving blood to protect the unborn from our nonsense.