Am I mad? Am I the only person who considers "victims" to include those victims of False Allegations (the exploding crime of this Century)? Both Slimy Starmer and Silly Sunak go on about "victims" meaning those claiming sexual abuse of some kind, most imaginary or inflated. But we all know and accept there ARE genuine victims of abuse. So why can't anybody admit there are also - ALSO - victims of other crimes, like Sir Edward Heath, Harvey Proctor and others (Gambo, Cliff, Tarbuck, Davidson, Savile - the list is endless)?