Mail article here about a law breaking policeman, but the headline also includes him attending orgies.


I couldn't be further from an orgy sort of person, myself, but as long as it is legal, what has this got to do with his job?

It is the same with Phillip Schofield. Wide condemnation about something (though seedy in the extreme) that is, as far as reported, completely legal and ok.

If "everyone" thinks having it off with nineteen year olds and prancing around in leather having sex with strangers should be banned, then please do campaign to have the law changed, march through the streets wearing your duffel coats of chastity and waving banners, but don't go shaming individual people about a non-crime.

OK for policemen to attend orgies! Would your view on that extend to medical personnel and teachers?

Tut. This one.www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1225217...lite-rape-squad.html

tabloids decide

The media are making a mountain out of a mole once again.

Group sex has never interested me either Honey, I have had a lot offers over the years. I couldn't care less who has sex with whom as long has not children or animals.

Schofield is immoral and a jerk but not a nonce, even the runner said it was consensual.

The problem with what he has done is not attending orgies it is allegedly having sex with vulnerable women who may be victims of the crimes he is investigating.

That is a clear abuse of position and trust and I am prepared to cast a moral judgment on it: it is wrong. The equivalent of a rape counsellor using sessions to fuck his clients on the couch.

It is further evidence of growing and alarming police corruption in this country.

The Mail of course is more interested in the orgy and leather angle! So sensationalises and dilutes the real issue. But a better story.

Simon Yates wrote:
OK for policemen to attend orgies! Would your view on that extend to medical personnel and teachers?



You assume your point is obvious Barney. It is not. Why not actually argue it: please tell us, what is "wrong" with a doctor attending an orgy?

Simon Yates wrote:
OK for policemen to attend orgies! Would your view on that extend to medical personnel and teachers?



Barney, It is ok because it is legal, and should not be listed along with crimes as if it is the same thing.

It sounds as if you are suggesting that people who attend orgies are likely to molest or attack children?

I'd prefer if my children didn't have a treacher who frequented orgies. If I knew or believed a teacher did, I'd simply seek another school. No need for judgement!

Simon Yates wrote:
I'd prefer if my children didn't have a treacher who frequented orgies. If I knew or believed a teacher did, I'd simply seek another school. No need for judgement!




You would seek another school for your child because of what you believe a teacher gets up to sexually without having exercised judgment...


You are taking logic to new places today Barney....

No judgement on the teacher - just one, for my child

It's funny that parents are wary of their children talking to strangers and sleeps overs.

However they are happily to send their kids off to school in the care of strangers. There were at least 2 or 3 dodgy teachers in my school.

One teacher used to tell girls to take their bras off if they were caught talking in class.

Some people do like orgies and good luck to them, but it's not my thing. My partner was asked by her ex to be a swinger. She punched him in one and then used a frying pan as a mallet on his noggin, she left him soon after that.


I do like feisty, gutsy and fiery women though. They got their primal instincts and survival skills intact. Hence I why I said "Yes" when she asked me out. She did all the wooing and chatting up.

Honey is clearly a strong woman and Mr Honey is lucky!

Wyot wrote:
Simon Yates wrote:
OK for policemen to attend orgies! Would your view on that extend to medical personnel and teachers?



You assume your point is obvious Barney. It is not. Why not actually argue it: please tell us, what is "wrong" with a doctor attending an orgy?

Are you hinting you were the Southampton Shag-Master?

Wyot wrote:
Simon Yates wrote:
I'd prefer if my children didn't have a treacher who frequented orgies. If I knew or believed a teacher did, I'd simply seek another school. No need for judgement!




You would seek another school for your child because of what you believe a teacher gets up to sexually without having exercised judgment...


You are taking logic to new places today Barney....

I think he meant there is no need to judge HIM? Not that anybody was, especially.

Honey wrote:
Wyot wrote:
Simon Yates wrote:
I'd prefer if my children didn't have a treacher who frequented orgies. If I knew or believed a teacher did, I'd simply seek another school. No need for judgement!




You would seek another school for your child because of what you believe a teacher gets up to sexually without having exercised judgment...


You are taking logic to new places today Barney....

I think he meant there is no need to judge HIM? Not that anybody was, especially.

I see what you mean Honey, but from his last response to me (above), he didn't mean this.

He is now saying his judgment is for his child and has nothing to do with judging the teacher. Even though it is the teacher he is hypothetically trying to get his child away from.

He claims that his child is better off away from the teacher but at the same time that he can reach this conclusion without judging the teacher.

I judge that I would be better off in life ignoring everything he posts, but this is of course no reflection on Barney...

Green Man wrote:
[quote]Wyot wrote:
[quote]Simon Yates wrote:


Are you hinting you were the Southampton Shag-Master?

No I am not a Doctor GM...