Thousands of children including a boy aged five, have been investigated for sexting, the BBC has learned.

www.bbc.com/news/uk-40566026

“Children as young as six are sexting suspects, Met Police reveal”

www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-51507352

Sexting among under-16s skyrocketing, says Labour.

And, not just online. Check, UK top-sales SeX-Filled 'FAMILY’ tabloid The SUN, Chief London Reporter Tom Wells: “Kids Aged 6 are Teacher Sex Abusers! Among a sharp rise in similar shocking cases, a six year old girl stood in front of a male teacher, lifted her skirt and boldly massaged herself through her underwear.”

Plus: “Sex pests aged FOUR kicked out of school: 14,754 expelled or suspended Sep ’06 – Jul ’11 for sexual misconduct. 1,123 children were of primary age, some in reception!”

Of course, it's all changed since 2011. It's FAR worse but the official coverups are sooo much better.

Kids have smartphones that connect to the Internet which is filled porn, too porn viewing actually rewires your brain. It makes you wonder if these kids mentioned in the articles have been abused/binged watch with their older siblings or cousins?

medium.com/illumination/what-porn-does-t...to-quit-78cfd1d899bd

You are as naughty as The Sun WT!

All your focus is on the youngest known case. You don't mention that the average age is 13-14 not 5.

Can we please have a source for the thousands (involving I am sure a very high percentage of 4 year olds as you imply) of primary school "sex pests" expelled between 2006 and 11? And if the problem is "sky rocketing" current figures for comparison?

Furthermore, what cover up? The figures appear freely available and the BBC is reporting the setting issue.

Teenagers are going to be interested (obsessed) with sex, always have been always will be. There will also be the odd 6 year old in the figures, in all likelihood acting out inappropriate behaviours they are witnessing in the home, and not evidencing a desire to have sex with their teacher.

Whether in a pre smartphone or post smartphone age none of this in any way absolves adults of responsibility not to engage with children illegally. Even if "provoked".

G.M. wrote, "It makes you wonder if these kids mentioned in the articles have been abused/binged watch with their older siblings or cousins?"

Or, more likely young generations mass sexualised by decades of highly suggestive soft porn in sex-filled 'Family' hypocrite media. Daily with near-nude adults like JK's ex-Sam Fox as desirable Sex Objects and Role Models - DOH?!

How many of today's mini posers and young wankers 'cum' through the 'approved' sex-filled 'Family' tabloid ranks?

Wyot wrote:
You are as naughty as The Sun WT!

All your focus is on the youngest known case. You don't mention that the average age is 13-14 not 5.

Can we please have a source for the thousands (involving I am sure a very high percentage of 4 year olds as you imply) of primary school "sex pests" expelled between 2006 and 11? And if the problem is "sky rocketing" current figures for comparison?

Furthermore, what cover up? The figures appear freely available and the BBC is reporting the setting issue.

Teenagers are going to be interested (obsessed) with sex, always have been always will be. There will also be the odd 6 year old in the figures, in all likelihood acting out inappropriate behaviours they are witnessing in the home, and not evidencing a desire to have sex with their teacher.

Whether in a pre smartphone or post smartphone age none of this in any way absolves adults of responsibility not to engage with children illegally. Even if "provoked".

Sounds like the 6 year old girl has either pervy uncle, aunt, mother, father.