After spending 17 years in prison for a rape he did not commit. I urge you to read Bob Woffinden's book The Nicholas Cases, which includes my case as one of the ten worst miscarriages of justice in the past 30 years. Please do read and think about this.

Terrific speech by Andrew. Now let's see whether the sysatem pays any attention or does anything. I'm still fighting to get the Court of Appeal to overturn MY wrongful conviction.

Might I point out that Andy Malkinson has waited for almost 20 years. I've waited for 23 years. Come on Court of Appeal. Overturn my wrongful conviction.

I have just been reading a bit about the Malkinson case - just awful. I can't understand how any jury could have convicted him beyond reasonable doubt...

Wyot wrote:
I have just been reading a bit about the Malkinson case - just awful. I can't understand how any jury could have convicted him beyond reasonable doubt...

He was a junkie, he might of been a petty crook and a troublemaker. Perhaps well known to the jury for the wrong reasons.

A lot of addicts can be well known in small communities or on pit estates.

However the jury love addicts, say they are guilty and go home or on to the next court case.

The police are corrupt to the core. However how they going to reverse 20 years of torment and damage?

Money just won't cut it. There needs to be sackings and pensions pots raided.