cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
The appalling Prince Charles cinema
Go to bottomPost New TopicPost Reply
TOPIC: The appalling Prince Charles cinema
#238541
The appalling Prince Charles cinema 1 Year, 8 Months ago  
This used to be the best cinema in London - often showing movies others refused to show. The ultimate Anti Censorship venue. But they seem to have gone into total reverse gear. We had the Premiere for our Me Me Me Movie there a decade ago - well attended though some technical problems, swiftly solved. We booked (and paid several thousand) for the Premiere of The Great ReSet - a few days before it was due, they cancelled (they watched the movie and objected to the content). They did repay the money - we found another venue. Censorship ROOLS at the vile Price Charles fascist screen.

www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/10/14/kevi...a-despite-acquittal/
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#238544
Wyot

Re:The appalling Prince Charles cinema 1 Year, 8 Months ago  
I think the Government should consider legislation to make it illegal to "cancel" someone who has not been found guilty at Court. I appreciate it is thwart with difficulties of proof. But in such cases as this where the decision is nakedly due purely to allegations, why should any venue get to discriminate in this way? 🤔 legislation goes against my grain but given it exists to protect every self-identifying trait known to man, why not by extension to protect the whole person?
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#238552
Green Man

Re:The appalling Prince Charles cinema 1 Year, 8 Months ago  
Wyot wrote:
I think the Government should consider legislation to make it illegal to "cancel" someone who has not been found guilty at Court. I appreciate it is thwart with difficulties of proof. But in such cases as this where the decision is nakedly due purely to allegations, why should any venue get to discriminate in this way? 🤔 legislation goes against my grain but given it exists to protect every self-identifying trait known to man, why not by extension to protect the whole person?

It's scary that everyone is guilty until proven innocent...even then you are guilty. Thank you media and social media users who are bedsit dwellers.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
Go to topPost New TopicPost Reply