When will it be more widely acknowledged what a stupid, self defeating policy lockdowns were.

www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-oxfordshire-65699991

Childhood obesity took a turn for the worse and of course the main reason anyway we lost the numbers we did with Covid was because we are so overweight and unhealthy.

We should have just said: if you are elderly or otherwise vulnerable here are the facts, look after yourself as you see fit, isolate if you need to. The rest of us, get on with it.

We tried to warn them, but we were called 'Conspiracy theorists" by the press and BBC.

The BBC/Sky journos should of read the King of Hits messages boards from the start!

The media is a cesspit.

I just love how the masks are slipping off about lockdown. However, it does seem too little, too late at the same time. Many are on the right side of history from the start. 4 years later there has been excess deaths. It was not long Covid it was side effects of the jabs and probably first stages of cancer.

Green Man wrote:
It was not long Covid it was side effects of the jabs and probably first stages of cancer

Are these your guesses, or do you have evidence/links?

I don't have time to watch your cartoons.

Sally Nice wrote:
[quote]Green Man wrote:


Are these your guesses, or do you have evidence/links?



This is what some of us were asking in 2020 regarding the effectiveness of masks and lockdowns. But never were we presented with any persuasive evidence.

Sally Nice wrote:
Green Man wrote:
It was not long Covid it was side effects of the jabs and probably first stages of cancer

Are these your guesses, or do you have evidence/links?

I don't have time to watch your cartoons.

You have time to reply to my posts and threads though.

Where is your counter-argument? I have the time to wait, as I have a 4-day weekend.

Wyot wrote:
[quote]Sally Nice wrote:
Green Man wrote:


Are these your guesses, or do you have evidence/links?



This is what some of us were asking in 2020 regarding the effectiveness of masks and lockdowns. But never were we presented with any persuasive evidence.

It makes you wonder if those who are jabbed and followed regret the choices they made at the time.

Green Man wrote:
[quote]Wyot wrote:
[quote]Sally Nice wrote:
[quote]Green Man wrote:


It makes you wonder if those who are jabbed and followed regret the choices they made at the time.

Never seen any persuasive evidence either about jabs being more problematic than Covid itself GM, which was a nasty illness for the vulnerable, and still can be, but unnecessarily over-reacted to. Which I know we do agree on.

Wyot wrote:
[quote]Green Man wrote:
[quote]Wyot wrote:
[quote]Sally Nice wrote:
Green Man wrote:


It makes you wonder if those who are jabbed and followed regret the choices they made at the time.

Never seen any persuasive evidence either about jabs being more problematic than Covid itself GM, which was a nasty illness for the vulnerable, and still can be, but unnecessarily over-reacted to. Which I know we do agree on.

When I had Covid (twice) both times felt like a very bad flu and I did have aches like everyone else. Over a few weeks, it just went. I didn't have jabs as I caught Covid before it was cool and mainstream. I still think people died with Covid, not from Covid. When the media showed some bloke with tubes in a hospital bed, they called him healthy when in fact he was massively obese.

Starmer and Boris knew it was bullshit hence they both had parties during the lockdown. Pensioners could die from the cold, due to them losing their Winter fuel benefit. I would not be surprised if there are gas explosions also when they leave the cooker hobs on to stay warm.

However, we were told seeing Granny could kill her during the plandemic. Let that sink in.

Green Man wrote:
[quote]Wyot wrote:
[quote]Green Man wrote:
[quote]Wyot wrote:
[quote]Sally Nice wrote:
[quote]Green Man wrote:


However, we were told seeing Granny could kill her during the plandemic. Let that sink in.

Yes the propaganda was thoughtless, disingenuous and downright wicked. They were sick times.

Also at the time there were many on here who would defend it - they have fallen silent.

I wonder why...

Wyot wrote:
[quote]Green Man wrote:
[quote]Wyot wrote:
[quote]Green Man wrote:
[quote]Wyot wrote:
[quote]Sally Nice wrote:
Green Man wrote:


However, we were told seeing Granny could kill her during the plandemic. Let that sink in.

Yes the propaganda was thoughtless, disingenuous and downright wicked. They were sick times.

Also at the time there were many on here who would defend it - they have fallen silent.

I wonder why...


Because it is not as straightforward as being right or wrong, and I am heartily sick of the whole stupid farce.

This would of never been published during the plandemic but the media are changing their minds on the jabs. The MSM took millions from the government to promote harmful junk.


www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1382617...m-Covid-vaccine.html

Honey wrote:
[quote]Wyot wrote:
[quote]Green Man wrote:
[quote]Wyot wrote:
[quote]Green Man wrote:
[quote]Wyot wrote:
[quote]Sally Nice wrote:
Green Man wrote:


Also at the time there were many on here who would defend it - they have fallen silent.

I wonder why...


Because it is not as straightforward as being right or wrong, and I am heartily sick of the whole stupid farce.

I wasn't including you Honey in this. You always gave thoughtful and - yes - nuanced posts on the situation. As you do on all subjects. Probably more than anyone here.

There were those, however, who said that people like me, JK and others were not qualified to have an opinion and should just shut up.

And more than this were indifferent to Covid deaths by suggesting that more people may die from the reaction to Covid than the disease itself; and this should be factored in to the very hard decisions that had to be made.

I simply note the absence of these people as the data comes in of lockdown linked deaths and other harms.

I loved lock down in Sydney.

as a carer I could still travel and there was little traffic..heaven

Wyot wrote:
[quote]Honey wrote:
[quote]Wyot wrote:
[quote]Green Man wrote:
[quote]Wyot wrote:
[quote]Green Man wrote:
[quote]Wyot wrote:
Sally Nice wrote:
Green Man wrote:


Also at the time there were many on here who would defend it - they have fallen silent.

I wonder why...


Because it is not as straightforward as being right or wrong, and I am heartily sick of the whole stupid farce.

I wasn't including you Honey in this. You always gave thoughtful and - yes - nuanced posts on the situation. As you do on all subjects. Probably more than anyone here.

There were those, however, who said that people like me, JK and others were not qualified to have an opinion and should just shut up.

And more than this were indifferent to Covid deaths by suggesting that more people may die from the reaction to Covid than the disease itself; and this should be factored in to the very hard decisions that had to be made.

I simply note the absence of these people as the data comes in of lockdown linked deaths and other harms.

Thank you Wyot

Safe and effective?

Another one who suffered with the clot shot. Yet, it's the same MSM outlet who is going on and on about the flu and XEC.

news.sky.com/story/family-of-man-who-too...ompensation-13217959