So the Labour manifesto so far that we should we support the unemployed.

Why should I feed kids that are not mine?

Schools are waste of time, get kids learning a trade, teach them about tax returns, vlogging etc.

Instead of building new schools or hospitals. They just want to cram as many people in wards and class rooms. Whilst letting in more and more boat people. MPs are now scared because immigrants are now moving near their gated private roads.

Starmer, will get us in involved in never endings wars and lockdowns.

We should stop providing children's allowances and close schools - as well as building no new hospitals?

Green Man wrote:
So the Labour manifesto so far that we should we support the unemployed.

Why should I feed kids that are not mine?

Schools are waste of time, get kids learning a trade, teach them about tax returns, vlogging etc.

Instead of building new schools or hospitals. They just want to cram as many people in wards and class rooms. Whilst letting in more and more boat people. MPs are now scared because immigrants are now moving near their gated private roads.

Starmer, will get us in involved in never endings wars and lockdowns.





This post caught my eye. Don't know if it's right or left wing or just plain bizarre. MPs are scared of immigrants! Does this poster even live in the UK, or in a colony somewhere?

Parents need to provide for their kids breakfast, dinners, meals and so. Single mothers need to open their legs for a man that can provide not for flings.

If the voting age is going to be lowered why the working age?

Kids know what they want to do when they are older that is make money online. If they can make money online let them get on with it. No need to teachers and teachers that fuck their students.

We could be a thousand new hospitals, it still would not be enough. The population in the UK is growing every day. Depopulation will happen and mens sperm count is shrinking and cancer is no a longer a rare; due to all the plastic and chemicals in clothing, paper, receipts/bus tickets, water bottles, food packaging, milk cartons. Then current ones will eventually close.

The government don't care if we live or die.

The government, any government, does not have your best interests at heart.

Now to Starmer. A midday meal is fine, many of us have had school dinners. That's sensible in the middle of the school day. But I am completely against these breakfast clubs nowadays. It's the parents responsibility to feed their children and make sure they leave home for the day ahead with something inside them. These are the basics of having children. If you can't manage it, don't have them! The latest idea of Starmer to get schools involved in making children brush their teeth is foolish and sinister interference. From the age of 3 to 5? But 3 year olds aren't at school and many are not at a nursery either, so how does that work, who's checking up from the government that they are properly brushing? Why is this a government's remit? They want to dictate that children cannot drink an energy drink too, so telling kids what to drink and how to brush their teeth.

What next? Toilet training for adults under Labour and a law against farting in public?

How about a new law against politicians lying to the electorate and being criminally responsible for deceiving the country and failing to carry out their promises. Starmer already has a very long charge sheet for political deception and that's before he has even had a day in power to do his worst. He's a chameleon who on 5th July will shapeshift into something quite different.

Green Man wrote:
The government don't care if we live or die.

Clearly you've had a difficult time; I've read some of your frequent posting. Everyone has made mistakes.

The government is elected by us all, most anyway. But don't come here to moan about everything.

Get up and go - today is a bonus. And so is next week - and the man who said 'thank you' for opening a door.

"Why should I feed kids that are not mine?"

What a heartless outlook. I have no children but would be more than happy for my taxes to be used in order so that no child goes hungry.

Spleen Man wrote:
"Why should I feed kids that are not mine?"

What a heartless outlook. I have no children but would be more than happy for my taxes to be used in order so that no child goes hungry.

I am not heartless at all. I agree no child should go hungry but both parents worked, nor was their kids from several fathers.

If child is hungry then the parents have let their own children down...not me.

Often parents 'let their children down', through no fault of their own.

Jenny Carson wrote:
Often parents 'let their children down', through no fault of their own.

That is their problem and look out.

Jenny Carson wrote:
Green Man wrote:
So the Labour manifesto so far that we should we support the unemployed.

Why should I feed kids that are not mine?

Schools are waste of time, get kids learning a trade, teach them about tax returns, vlogging etc.

Instead of building new schools or hospitals. They just want to cram as many people in wards and class rooms. Whilst letting in more and more boat people. MPs are now scared because immigrants are now moving near their gated private roads.

Starmer, will get us in involved in never endings wars and lockdowns.





This post caught my eye. Don't know if it's right or left wing or just plain bizarre. MPs are scared of immigrants! Does this poster even live in the UK, or in a colony somewhere?


Why do people think you can only be left wing or right wing?

The alternative 'bizarre' option is obviously more accurate. You seem to crave attention here daily, by trying to be controversial and notorious (albeit illogicaly/fact abused). And hate sport, politics, formal education, voting, Bournemouth etc. Good luck to you.

Jenny Carson wrote:
The alternative 'bizarre' option is obviously more accurate. You seem to crave attention here daily, by trying to be controversial and notorious (albeit illogicaly/fact abused). And hate sport, politics, formal education, voting, Bournemouth etc. Good luck to you.

I guess you don't people thoughts and opinions on current affairs.

Yes, Good luck to you and thank you.

Does this poster even live in the UK, or in a colony somewhere?

Yes, I do live in the UK and have done for a number of years.

I was born and bred in a colony called Ireland. The English bastardize the little Ireland like you did across the globe.

The problem I have with this site now is not knowing who is genuine or not. It has always had to accommodate this; but it is reaching unworkable levels!

GM you have been valiantly responding to Jenny Carson, but I - rightly or wrongly - assumed it was Barney amusing himself again. Similarly Spleen Man and others.

Whole Truth now seems to use many different names each time.

It is pure speculation on my part but one of the last genuine posters (by that I mean using one name and not pretending to be new) - Honey - seems to have been largely driven off by all this. In particular the tosser(s) who use the genuine posters names now and then.

I can count on one hand the genuine posters now, otherwise it seems to be Barney, WT and lots of "Mikes" or "Kevins" who all seem to write and sound exactly the same.

With an honorable nod to "Carl" who appears every 3 months to tell JK just what he thinks of him!

Not complaining as this is a free site with an open policy and we can choose to use it or not.

But it does make life difficult currently...

Oh I do agree WYOT and even this URL is not your usual. Sadly it seems to be, more and more, just a place for waste-of-spacers. I miss Honey too. If you knew how many posts I just do not put up either because they are from regular trolls or scammers or because they are stupid. We used to find our filters dumped the regulars and even the proxies but they now find ways around that. Times have changed - like the world. As you know, sometimes I check on validity but even that gets pointless and takes up time. Thanks for sticking around.

Meanwhile on the subject of Starmer - he gets worse and worse and I think the public is beginning to see through him. A decent leader and Labour would walk it. With Starmer I'm not so sure. I'm not keen on Sunak but think he's marginally better than Starmer.

JK2006 wrote:
Oh I do agree WYOT and even this URL is not your usual. Sadly it seems to be, more and more, just a place for waste-of-spacers.

By URL I think you mean IP address JK, but anyway, IP addresses can change. Mine is dynamic and changes because my Internet Service Provider routes stuff through differing servers in different locations depending on how busy they are...

But I am almost falling asleep writing that; so I suspect lost you long ago!

My point is that it is not possible for you to prevent the rubbish; so thank you for continuing to host and putting up with it all.

God alone knows what they get out of it...

Overall it's more sensible to feed hungry (blameless) kids rather than have their parents break into your house looking for cash or something to sell.

Multiply that by a million parents and you'd have a 19th century situation where you either hang those parents (thus making their kiddies orphan to be, err fed by the State) or transport them to Australia..a choice many where given including a great grandfather of mine in the early 1800s..a banker in Ireland who chose Australia to be sent to after a disagreement over bank deposits.

Poverty is not cheap. 100s of years have proved that as where there is excessive poverty most certainly in the West, crime will escalate.

Rather than pay 100s of Millions of pounds to police the nation, the courts and burgeoning prisons, I reckon well fed kiddies of the poor is a better choice.

If you are in the ghastly Starmer's electorate vote for Andrew Feinstein a former South African MP under Nelson Mandela who looks to unseat Starmer over his appalling Palestine statements and blatant lying about Jeremy Corbyn who he knifed in the back.

hedda wrote:


Poverty is not cheap. 100s of years have proved that as where there is excessive poverty most certainly in the West, crime will escalate.



I do agree broadly Hedda and I too would rather pay taxes to feed a hungry child than let the outcome of having feckless parents play out. However, this needs to be done while also addressing the kind of concerns GM and others raise: a society that encourages irresponsible individualism is also very expensive, and prone to anti-social and criminal behaviour.