IMPORTANT NOTE: You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
Judging from the interview and article below, this woman seems quite believable. What gives me slight pause, and I feel rather bad about that because she could well be telling the truth, is that she had been an aspiring actress at the time of the alleged assault.
(Rolf Harris's Australian accuser who sold her story to the Australian media (doing a paid TV interview and a paid magazine interview) a year before the trial and whose Rolf Harris abuse story had multiple points in common with Jimmy Savile's great niece Caroline Robinson's earlier Jimmy Savile abuse story (told to This Morning and uploaded to YouTube seven months before the Rolf Harris accuser's TV interview was broadcast and uploaded to YouTube) was a member of a youth theatre at the time of the alleged assault - which I think she invented, hence the need to copy the Savile story. Rolf Harris's new defence team raised this issue of the similar stories during the appeal but, according to the appeal judgment, because the original defence team had been aware of parallels between the two stories but chose not to raise this in court as they didn't want the jury drawing parallels between Rolf Harris and Jimmy Savile, the appeal judges refused to admit this evidence and allow the new defence team a "second bite of the cherry".)
Forums 
