Vice President Kamala answering random questions without warning and her comfort blanket teleprompt machine.

youtu.be/PyGw5DaeScc?si=FTiSnhWas3lB14oH

Trump said to his MAGA crowd a couple days ago that "wasn't he good not using a teleprompter" while literally standing in front of one.

I listened to the Howard Stern interview with Harris. It was a car crash, Stern no doubt is being blackmailed in some way. He was kissing ass and has become everything he once hated.


A shit load of his archives are online. Howard Stern has probably been to Epstein's island and he knew P Diddy very well.

There's no sign of Kamala Harris in that video titled "Worst Beauty Pageant Responses In History!".

Never thought 60 Minutes will be tough on Harris.

I have said a lot of the Black community can't stand her. Bill Whitaker is probably part of the stats.

Jo wrote:
There's no sign of Kamala Harris in that video titled "Worst Beauty Pageant Responses In History!".

Oh come on are you serious, you surely understand satire. I found it very funny actually and it nails the point. Don't take everything so literally Jo, although the real Kamala is beyond even these airheads at times for mangled meaningless nonsense.

Steve wrote:
Jo wrote:
There's no sign of Kamala Harris in that video titled "Worst Beauty Pageant Responses In History!".

Oh come on are you serious, you surely understand satire. I found it very funny actually and it nails the point. Don't take everything so literally Jo, although the real Kamala is beyond even these airheads at times for mangled meaningless nonsense.

The left can't meme Steve!

Steve wrote:
Oh come on are you serious, you surely understand satire. I found it very funny actually and it nails the point. Don't take everything so literally Jo, although the real Kamala is beyond even these airheads at times for mangled meaningless nonsense.
Unlike satire, it doesn't "nail" any point, other than that you, Steve/Andy/Greg, or whatever your name is, is unable to provide any evidence of Kamala Harris being an "airhead".

I believe that the Harris campaign are deliberately keeping her away from unscripted events and awkward interviews as much as humanly possible because she is not good with thinking fast on her feet and the perception that the more she is out there being seen in such situations the less the public will like what they see. She is supposed to have had a very poor interview on the 60 Minutes show over there from what I've heard, although I have not seen it yet and aim to do so based on reports about it.

Rich wrote:
I believe that the Harris campaign are deliberately keeping her away from unscripted events and awkward interviews as much as humanly possible because she is not good with thinking fast on her feet and the perception that the more she is out there being seen in such situations the less the public will like what they see. She is supposed to have had a very poor interview on the 60 Minutes show over there from what I've heard, although I have not seen it yet and aim to do so based on reports about it.

could well be.

The big difference is battling against a candidate like Trump is hard for someone who tries to tell the truth.

Pathological liars like Trump can blatantly lie so easily and he does although he wanders off script more often these days.

I said this long ago when Trump was first president and his fascist like behaviour became apparent. He is not in himself the real problem..but when a younger Trump comes along everyone should be worried...JD Vance.

hedda wrote:
Rich wrote:
I believe that the Harris campaign are deliberately keeping her away from unscripted events and awkward interviews as much as humanly possible because she is not good with thinking fast on her feet and the perception that the more she is out there being seen in such situations the less the public will like what they see. She is supposed to have had a very poor interview on the 60 Minutes show over there from what I've heard, although I have not seen it yet and aim to do so based on reports about it.

could well be.

The big difference is battling against a candidate like Trump is hard for someone who tries to tell the truth.

Pathological liars like Trump can blatantly lie so easily and he does although he wanders off script more often these days.

I said this long ago when Trump was first president and his fascist like behaviour became apparent. He is not in himself the real problem..but when a younger Trump comes along everyone should be worried...JD Vance.



Is that your word salad for today Hedda?

Jo wrote:
[quote]Steve wrote:



Unlike satire, it doesn't "nail" any point, other than that you, Steve/Andy/Greg, or whatever your name is, is unable to provide any evidence of Kamala Harris being an "airhead".

Bullseye Jo! There is a lot of misoginy around Harris and in these threads. "Lighten up luv I was just jokin'..." Piss off.

Maybe because Harris is useless and out of her depth. She could put her election policies into action, Biden is still in charge...right?

Green Man wrote:
Maybe because Harris is useless and out of her depth. She could put her election policies into action, Biden is still in charge...right?

Perhaps so GM but there is also misogyny - it's in the language, the comparisons.

I don't think misogyny has got anything to do with it. There are plenty of capable female politicians on both sides of the political divide, black or white, who would command far more respect and be seen as genuinely credible candidates for President - even Hillary Clinton for God's sake, or Michelle Obama.

On Trump and his lies, well yes he knows how to spin plenty of yarns I'll not disagree with that but if anyone thinks Harris, and Walz too, have not been fabricating all kinds of claims in the past month or two they haven't been paying attention. Too many to mention infact, from guns and fracking to making things up about his personal backstory in Walz case time and again that are provably untrue yet are brushed aside as just mis-speaking when called out.

What's happening in the States at the moment is that Trump is so demonised by vast numbers of opponents that anyone will do to get rid of him and they (Democrats) are proving unable to see the quite clear flaws in their own candidate, although I think many know it deep down in just the same way they all knew it about Biden's age and declining mental aptitude but chose to ignore it until it blew up in their faces on TV and they could no longer pretend.

Rich wrote:
I don't think misogyny has got anything to do with it. There are plenty of capable female politicians on both sides of the political divide, black or white, who would command far more respect and be seen as genuinely credible candidates for President - even Hillary Clinton for God's sake, or Michelle Obama.



I didnt say that misogyny has anything to do with judging her abilities. I am saying that misogyny emerges in the manner of criticismused by many who hold her abilities in low regard. This is a thing a lot of insecure men do to women in general.

I appreciate your support, Wyot. Thank you. And I agree with your comments.

It seems that even some black men may have a problem with Kamala Harris because she's a woman.

Obama tells men to drop ‘excuses’ and support Kamala Harris over Trump

Wyot wrote:
Rich wrote:
I don't think misogyny has got anything to do with it. There are plenty of capable female politicians on both sides of the political divide, black or white, who would command far more respect and be seen as genuinely credible candidates for President - even Hillary Clinton for God's sake, or Michelle Obama.



I didnt say that misogyny has anything to do with judging her abilities. I am saying that misogyny emerges in the manner of criticismused by many who hold her abilities in low regard. This is a thing a lot of insecure men do to women in general.

I do like strong women and direct women, who don't do sexual favours for promotions. They got promotions through hard work and on merit. I call them ball-breakers.