Allegedly had the temerity to 'flirt' with a female colleague back in 2018.He allegedly took his top off and boasted about his sex life. It was investigated at the time, and was viewed as nothing. And Wallace insists he made no sexual comments. But so what if he did? Amongst adults? Now The Sun feels it is their duty to rake up this non incident. Be in no doubt this will effect his reputation and his TV work. Utterly bloody ridiculous.

Downing Street Cat wrote:
Allegedly had the temerity to 'flirt' with a female colleague back in 2018.He allegedly took his top off and boasted about his sex life. It was investigated at the time, and was viewed as nothing. And Wallace insists he made no sexual comments. But so what if he did? Amongst adults? Now The Sun feels it is their duty to rake up this non incident. Be in no doubt this will effect his reputation and his TV work. Utterly bloody ridiculous.

Crazy isn't it DSC and that TV opera singer strictly fuss. No words for how silly it has all got.

Wyot wrote:
Downing Street Cat wrote:
Allegedly had the temerity to 'flirt' with a female colleague back in 2018.He allegedly took his top off and boasted about his sex life. It was investigated at the time, and was viewed as nothing. And Wallace insists he made no sexual comments. But so what if he did? Amongst adults? Now The Sun feels it is their duty to rake up this non incident. Be in no doubt this will effect his reputation and his TV work. Utterly bloody ridiculous.

Crazy isn't it DSC and that TV opera singer strictly fuss. No words for how silly it has all got.
Barking madness Wyot.And that word 'inappropriate' again. Well I think it's 'inappropriate' to lust for the destruction of someone's life and livelihood.

Downing Street Cat wrote:
[quote]Wyot wrote:
[quote]Downing Street Cat wrote:


Well I think it's 'inappropriate' to lust for the destruction of someone's life and livelihood.

Very good point.

Wyot wrote:
[quote]Downing Street Cat wrote:
[quote]Wyot wrote:
Downing Street Cat wrote:


Well I think it's 'inappropriate' to lust for the destruction of someone's life and livelihood.

Very good point.


Bearing in mind that lust is 'a strong sexual desire' - these comments, at the very least, are thought provoking....


😒🙄

He took his top off, okay, so what. It sounds strange but context is everything. Are we going to reach the stage where a man without his shirt on is deemed to be flashing or something?

Why can't these women just answer back at men like Wallace when they are just acting daft in front of them.

I never did like him, even before he found fame somehow.

Bawdy jokes always have their place but if he told one joke after another does became tiresome and if he is trying to be saucy than before it could become much more inappropriate.

I am no saint, to be honest, friends and I would blurt out crude remarks in public when we were in our late teens or early 20s, about things smelling like vaginas or the odd rape joke. Even rape jokes were the norm in films and sitcoms. Glad we have moved on.

Looking back I am ashamed of myself. Boys' brains are badly wired, I don't think I had a filter until I reached about 28 or so.

Al Gershwin wrote:
[quote]Wyot wrote:
[quote]Downing Street Cat wrote:
Wyot wrote:
Downing Street Cat wrote:


Well I think it's 'inappropriate' to lust for the destruction of someone's life and livelihood.

Very good point.


Bearing in mind that lust is 'a strong sexual desire' - these comments, at the very least, are thought provoking....


😒🙄

It isn't only used in relation to sex, Barney. Lust can be about anything, most often life, power or money.