Guilty. As appalled as I was by their actions, I would not send them to prison. Pointless. Fines, and make them work in areas of natural beauty to help maintain them. No doubt they'll go down to appease the Express/Mail readers. It was a stunning tree and a stunning location, and they are guilty of mindless stupidity.

I wouldn't want them near nature to be honest. They obviously don't appreciate it.

These idiots had nothing to do with nature.

However - nature isn't as popular as it was!


en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nature_deficit_disorder#:~:text=Nature%2Ddeficit%20disorder%20is%20the,wide%20range%20of%20behavioral%20problems.

Very hard to get to nature when woods and meadows are demolished for brand new housing estates. The houses are identical and have hardly enough room for a sausage roll.

Wonder why they did it. Sheer maliciousness? They should be put to work planting trees.

Jo wrote:
Wonder why they did it. Sheer maliciousness? They should be put to work planting trees.

I wonder if they have beef with the National Trust.

Both men look about 15 years older than their ages. Did they have a tough paper round, inbreedingng or just shit genetics? Poor genetics can be a common trait in the traveller communities.

In some cases, inbreeding was an open secret, especially in the Romani communities, probably not so much these days, they used to marry their cousins and worst case, stick to their siblings. As a kid in Ireland were told to leave the gypsies alone incase they were tinkers. Many were, but not all, some were decent, some were vile, and bully boys. Some would start a fight over nothing, like looking at their girl the "wrong way", whatever that means.

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1469548...lanning-dispute.html

Jo wrote:
Wonder why they did it. Sheer maliciousness? They should be put to work planting trees.

Two unremarkable dullards, Jo, who seemingly did it to get their actions on the main news and across the media. Beyond tragedy.