What has Donald Trump got against Wikipedia?

I find Wikipedia a valuable source of info.

I even penned a page for a pal of mine who was a top TV sports journalist in Oz which was accepted.

When I hadn't heard from him for 3 weeks about a planned trip to Surfer's Paradise to visit him I sadly read that Wiki page to find put he had died. Someone had added the info which is how it works.

Wikipedia has nothing but far left bias on everything. I no longer use it.

Green Man wrote:
Wikipedia has nothing but far left bias


I haven't seen it.



BBC News - Wikipedia legally challenges 'flawed' online safety rules

www.bbc.com/news/articles/c62j2gr8866o

Only when it does not fit an agenda.


nypost.com/2021/07/16/wikipedia-co-found...aning-establishment/

Green Man wrote:
Wikipedia has nothing but far left bias on everything. I no longer use it.

have you got an example?

They have very strict editorial guidelines and pages have to cite sources for info or it's pointed out that a certain statement has not been backed up.

As a great example earlier today- I looked at the pages for the recent Oz elections and the US & UK general elections.

Masses of useful facts and figures information & completely accurate.

Some of the more rabid Right call it Wokeipedia. The Awful Truth is sometimes a very bitter pill. I always take note how the Far Right love cancelling anything with opposing views. I donate £5 yearly to Wiki. I think it's invaluable. I talk as someone who was once assigned to stand in a supermarket in Romford flogging physical encyclopedias. I was sacked after 2 days. No customers. lol.

Depends what you call accurate. If it's against the agenda everything is a conspiracy or QAnon.

I love how Jan 6 is a labelled an insurrection by Wikipedia and the MSM. When the protesters were let in and the one person who was murdered by the authorities was a Trump voters. Have you seen the CCTV footage and Shamen guy yelling out to that we must be peaceful? If not then why not it's all out there.

Green Man wrote:
Depends what you call accurate. If it's against the agenda everything is a conspiracy or QAnon.

I love how Jan 6 is a labelled an insurrection by Wikipedia and the MSM. When the protesters were let in and the one person who was murdered by the authorities was a Trump voters. Have you seen the CCTV footage and Shamen guy yelling out to that we must be peaceful? If not then why not it's all out there.

So now we know why Trump and his followers hate Wikipedia. lol.

You and Hedda wanted one example of bias from Wikipedia, I gave you one!

Downing Street Cat wrote:
[quote]Green Man wrote:
Depends what you call accurate. If it's against the agenda everything is a conspir

So now we know why Trump and his followers hate Wikipedia. lol.

Yes it's not rocket science is it. In Trump's mind you are for or against him. Against him equals "baddies".

Several people died from the Capitol insurrection and there are endless videos available of the vile viciousness of the invaders who beat police officer with flag poles.

4 Police officers committed suicide after.

The shooting of a woman invader was unfortunate but it is blatantly clear in videos of it that those inside were in fear of their lives and who wouldn't be with a vicious baying mob smashing the doors down.

Trump, like the ghastly moronic MAGA crowd still say they were tourists when 100s of videos say otherwise.

Denying this reality is absurd and using one page of Wikipedia when it has over 70 million pages really is laughable.

Officer's died watching Frazzle Drip but that's walking on dangerous ground. Doing your self in is not murder. Why is Ray Epps still free? People knew he was was plant when they yelled out Fed.

Oddly, the death of Kevin Greeson is now forgotten about.