IMPORTANT NOTE: You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
Oh for God's sake... He was said to have turned up unannounced at her hotel room after dinner and, although he left when asked, the encounter left her feeling distressed and uncomfortable.
hedda wrote: If she felt distressed..then she was distressed and is entitled to sympathy
But will the police force aid her with therapy?
I would think in a way he may need therapy as well.
I'm not sure how the younger generation makes romantic contact these days. It's touch and go that any sort of action can be viewed as hostile.
I don't think she is entitled to sympathy but I agree with the spirit of your post.
If people thought less about what they think they are entitled to and more about what their obligations are, we would have a much healthier society.
If he had thought more about his obligation to not make a lone woman in a hotel room uncomfortable because he feels entitled to be able to try and get sex, and she had thought more about her obligation not to ruin a career by assuming she was at risk when his actions, in retrospect, were not threatening, despite how she felt at the time about them, then this nonsense wouldn't have happened.
But they both just put themselves at the centre of things.
Her reaction to him sending her texts and turning up at her hotel room may have been coloured by what he wrote in his texts and how shey may have replied, which isn't mentioned in the article. She may have felt threatened by whatever he wrote and by him finding out which hotel room she was in and turning up there. Women don't usually like it when men don't take no for an answer.