IMPORTANT NOTE: You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
|
Home Forums |
TOPIC: STARMER - one year
|
|
Re:STARMER - one year 5 Days, 9 Hours ago
|
|
It should however be remembered that his government inherited 'the worst set of circumstances since the second world war'.
This piece - published about a year ago - is a reminder of the virtually impossible difficulties faced. Before Trump returned!
Eight charts that lay bare Labour’s spending inheritance from Tories | Tax and spending | The Guardian
share.google/Xb1kuyjBhPFL2vhrk
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Re:STARMER - one year 5 Days, 6 Hours ago
|
|
Green Man wrote:
Starmer. He is the worst PM since Blair
Blair was one of the very few PM's to reduce our National Debt - by running surpluses. And the last one!!
Was Starmer responsible for the disastrous state of the economy - that he inherited?
Eight charts that lay bare Labour’s spending inheritance from Tories | Tax and spending |
The Guardian
share.google/Xb1kuyjBhPFL2vhrk
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Re:STARMER - one year 3 Days, 19 Hours ago
|
|
Downing Street Cat wrote:
Wyot wrote:
Downing Street Cat wrote:
Shut down all the schools. Children will learn more at home.
They would never be off bloody Nintendos and Smart Phones!!
But what are they learning at school? It's still designed to keep kids stupid and poor.
They are learning to interact with other children DSC.
They are learning through sharing resources and time and collaborating with other children, that they are not the centre of the Universe. They are learning to follow structure, routine and authority, which is central, psychologically, to children's sense of security and feeling valued. They are learning the importance of reciprocal and applied social obligations through play. They are learning, if in unloving or abusive homes, that there are safe spaces in the world and not to despair. They are learning that differences in ethnic or social groupings has no bearing on the "others" humanity or capacity to love.
They are also learning less important matters such as English, maths, physics, history etc...
I'm not sure what you mean by saying school is "designed" to keep kids "stupid"? Or "poor". By stupid do you mean ignorant of something or slow to learn? By poor, poor in spirit, or future income? What does this design look like?
PS I'm not a teacher!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|