So the latest is that "family", like siblings, accuse the publishers of not including stuff about her abuse by her husband. Why? Because he'll inherit her ill gotten gains. It is SOO transparent; yet most people still sympathise with the appalling dead hooker.

www.telegraph.co.uk/us/news/2025/08/26/v...sbands-abuse-family/

But this is more serious than it looks. As long as media and punters prefer "a great story" - i.e. anything involving Prince Andrew or Jeffrey Epstein or Donald Trump - they will continue to admire the Emperor's New Clothes. And to ignore the real problems (like GAZA).

So we get the BBC, a vital, trusted news organisation, obeying hype groups and ignoring the verified truth. So viewers are not allowed to see that superb GAZA documentary or that Oscar winning No Other Land. Yet news readers can use words like "terrible" and "unbelievable" when reporting facts.