So predictable that the Bell Hotel appeal would be won. The Labour Government that wants migrants out of hotels but made the case for them staying in them. The report below states they cannot win either way, great for opponents.

But within this article there is a standout line that says

"the government has a legal duty to keep them off the streets".

www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c7vlpdqeg4qo


But it doesn't have a legal duty to keep homeless, many single male Britons, some of them ex-forces who served the country, off the streets. Britons without a place to keep warm and dry can keep stay on the streets in the gutter, cold, wet, and unhappy, looked at like they are nothing and the government feels no obligation to them, and they total a far lesser number than the past year boat arrivals, in the region of 10,000 rough sleeper homeless I last read. Help get these people's lives back in order and eradicate rough sleeping Britons fully. Why do they have fewer rights in their own country than a random person illegally entering who has no claim or connection to the UK in the first place. We are morally bankrupt.

If Jesus Christ reappeared today and said "love thy neighbour as thyself" and told the parable of the Good Samaritan maybe he'd be called morally bankrupt too.

I don't see why a first world country can't deal humanely with both home-grown homeless and asylum seekers. They're all human beings and there shouldn't be a pecking order saying "you're less deserving because".

Love Thy Neighbour works both ways. Also have you seen parts of Yorkshire looking like ghettos in person? My sister in law was the only lone white woman in a street in Leicestershire, she had to move when the threats and intimidation got too much.

Jo wrote:
If Jesus Christ reappeared today and said "love thy neighbour as thyself" and told the parable of the Good Samaritan maybe he'd be called morally bankrupt too.

I don't see why a first world country can't deal humanely with both home-grown homeless and asylum seekers. They're all human beings and there shouldn't be a pecking order saying "you're less deserving because".

I won't argue with you on that BUT it is because we fail to do this and actively ignore or place others ahead of our own nationals within our own country that there is this problem that I describe as morally bankrupt. If you had a close family member under your own roof who needed help of some sort but instead ignored them and chose to give your time and energy to a neighbour down the road who you don't even know then I think you can see the issue clearly here when personalised at that level. It would seem obscene and rightly raise eyebrows.

Do you really think many of these boat illegals are going to love us as they do themselves? Good natured kind people can often be taken advantage of by unscrupulous people who see that kindness as a weakness and play on it. That's effectively what the UK is in comparison to these illegal migrants floating across.

I agree Rich,

Bullies will always go for the weak and vulnerable members of society, so why love thy neighbour if they don't love you?

Has anyone ever read and studied their Bible or do they cherry-pick a few words of verses to suit an agenda? Historically, Love Thy Neighbour was a message about not to hate or take vengeance on your fellow Israelisits.

So it seems everyone else is fair game. Not forgetting the Catholic holy book has additional books which are omitted from the KJV.

It does not help that there are so many versions of the Bible that keep changing phrases, words; it's now becoming more and more woke with each translation/publication.


Don't get me started on the Talmud.


I am sure people would rather focus on a mad, ancient old codger who built a boat and rescued some animals, even bats, orangutans, American Bald Eagle, Black bears, Polar bears, kangaroos, crocodiles and no doubt the mother-in-law. Noah didn't die at 500 years old but rather from booze.

Jo wrote:
If Jesus Christ reappeared today and said "love thy neighbour as thyself" and told the parable of the Good Samaritan maybe he'd be called morally bankrupt too.

I don't see why a first world country can't deal humanely with both home-grown homeless and asylum seekers. They're all human beings and there shouldn't be a pecking order saying "you're less deserving because".

Abdul Aziz Kawam, does not love his Canadian neighbours.

globalnews.ca/news/11342396/security-vid...r-attack-surrey-bus/

www.westernstandard.news/news/self-procl...gers-in-surrey/65832

Green Man wrote:
Jo wrote:
If Jesus Christ reappeared today and said "love thy neighbour as thyself" and told the parable of the Good Samaritan maybe he'd be called morally bankrupt too.

I don't see why a first world country can't deal humanely with both home-grown homeless and asylum seekers. They're all human beings and there shouldn't be a pecking order saying "you're less deserving because".

Abdul Aziz Kawam, does not love his Canadian neighbours.

globalnews.ca/news/11342396/security-vid...r-attack-surrey-bus/

www.westernstandard.news/news/self-procl...gers-in-surrey/65832

You know GM it would be possible to post lots of videos of crimes committed by white looking probably non immigrant people with no obvious religious affiliations, and this would not prove a point about immigration or religion either.

Just that people do bad things.

And perhaps we need more real religious observance and love of neighbour.

The mad, the bitter, the drug-addled will always find some reason or excuse to do what they want when they put themselves at the centre of the Universe. When they make themselves God.

Whether they arrived "on a boat"; or were born in deepest rural Dorset.

You could say if Canada didn't let this religion nutter in then it would one less injured. All these incidents do soon add up Wyot.

Look up the rape and sexual assualt stats. When people know that all religious text in written by mankind and not some magic man in the sky?

Police pepper-sprayed an 11-year-old kid, women can't even carry mace to protect themselves. I have read comments on social media like Why is the kid there? In my view, he is expressing his free speech on what very little there is; he is probably worried about his future. I wish the British MSM would drop the Americanisms. Even an old lady was pepper-sprayed.

www.standard.co.uk/news/london/canary-wh...police-b1245357.html

www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/boy-11-pep...prayed-cops-35823465

Police are not on our side www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cn9y0lvpyqvo

www.express.co.uk/news/world/2102591/met...cer#comments-wrapper

The answer of "yes" by Bridget Phillipson on Sky News yesterday morning when answering a question by Trevor Phillips just needs a thread all of its own to be honest. It's scarcely believable she said it aloud. She's finished.

Rich wrote:
The answer of "yes" by Bridget Phillipson on Sky News yesterday morning when answering a question by Trevor Phillips just needs a thread all of its own to be honest. It's scarcely believable she said it aloud. She's finished.

Was this Mrs Ball? I don't Sly News, Rich.

Green Man wrote:


Look up the rape and sexual assualt stats. When people know that all religious text in written by mankind and not some magic man in the sky?


Sorry GM not ignoring this I just don't understand the point. Could you re-phrase?

Me neither

Green Man wrote:
Rich wrote:
The answer of "yes" by Bridget Phillipson on Sky News yesterday morning when answering a question by Trevor Phillips just needs a thread all of its own to be honest. It's scarcely believable she said it aloud. She's finished.

Was this Mrs Ball? I don't Sly News, Rich.

Neither do I. I stopped watching Sky News at least five if not more years ago now. Who's Mrs Ball? Actually in recent months I've almost completely stopped watching GB News too, what does that say about them now!


This is a must watch Outspoken show from this evening GM, it really is, the policing being filmed and all the rest of it, where to start! Referencing my Phillipson bit from Sky News he has that clip on here from 42minutes 30seconds onwards, her admitting after being pushed "yes" that she agrees with illegal immigrants being placed ahead of local Brits in their own area. If you look at that Phillipson woman she seems like a pre-programmed dead eyed robotic automaton.

www.youtube.com/live/noxtaymDERQ?feature=shared

Rich, you need to understand globalism, which is replacing nationalism.

Rich wrote:
So predictable that the Bell Hotel appeal would be won. The Labour Government that wants migrants out of hotels but made the case for them staying in them. The report below states they cannot win either way, great for opponents.

But within this article there is a standout line that says

"the government has a legal duty to keep them off the streets".

www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c7vlpdqeg4qo


But it doesn't have a legal duty to keep homeless, many single male Britons, some of them ex-forces who served the country, off the streets. Britons without a place to keep warm and dry can keep stay on the streets in the gutter, cold, wet, and unhappy, looked at like they are nothing and the government feels no obligation to them, and they total a far lesser number than the past year boat arrivals, in the region of 10,000 rough sleeper homeless I last read. Help get these people's lives back in order and eradicate rough sleeping Britons fully. Why do they have fewer rights in their own country than a random person illegally entering who has no claim or connection to the UK in the first place. We are morally bankrupt.

Fuck all to do with numbers of migrants. Everything to do with greed.

I didn't say that British homelessness and lack of action on it had anything to do with migration. I was alluding to the choices that are being made about who we help or who we seem to ignore. When Theresa May was PM she pledged to eradicate rough sleeping homeless by 2027. How's that going then, we're just 16 months away now?

www.gov.uk/government/news/government-an...ugh-sleeping-by-2027